Prescot Brook (Logwood Mill Brook) Water Body
Moderate ecological status
Get Prescot Brook (Logwood Mill Brook) data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB112069060710
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
- NGRSJ4596290679
- Catchment area17.449 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Length7.017 km
- Catchment area1744.86 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
Ecological | Moderate | Moderate |
Biological quality elements | Poor | Poor |
Fish | Poor | Poor |
Invertebrates | Poor | Poor |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | ||
Macrophytes Sub Element | Poor | Poor |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Moderate | Poor |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) | Poor | |
Dissolved oxygen | High | Good |
Phosphate | High | Good |
Temperature | High | High |
pH | High | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | Supports good |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Moderate | Moderate |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Moderate or less | Moderate or less |
Specific pollutants | High | High |
Chromium (VI) | High | High |
Copper | High | High |
Zinc | High | High |
Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
Priority substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Fail | |
Fluoranthene | Good | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Diffuse source | Contaminated land | Urban and transport | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Contaminated land | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Misconnections | Domestic General Public | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Domestic General Public | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Misconnections | Domestic General Public | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Contaminated land | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Other pressures | Fish stocking | Local and Central Government | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Other pressures | Ecological recovery time - surface waters | No sector responsible | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Misconnections | Domestic General Public | Fish | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Biological quality elements | Moderate | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use |
Fish | Moderate | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use |
Invertebrates | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Not assessed | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2015 | |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2015 | |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Specific pollutants | High | 2015 | |
Chromium (VI) | High | 2015 | |
Copper | High | 2015 | |
Zinc | High | 2015 | |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority substances | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
Dittton Brook (Halewood to Mersey Estuary) NVZ | S640 | Nitrates Directive |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.