Low Maynard Reservoir Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB30641900
  • Water Body TypeLake
  • Hydromorphological designationartificial
  • NGRTQ3523289615
  • Altitude11 m
  • Mean depth1 m
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Surface area0.08 km2
  • Surface area8.033 ha
  • Catchment area14.75 ha

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalModerateModerate
Biological quality elementsModerateGood
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerateModerate
PhytoplanktonModerateGood
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
SalinityHighHigh
Total NitrogenBadBad
Total PhosphorusBadBad
Supporting elements (Surface Water)ModerateModerate
Expert JudgementModerateModerate
Mitigation Measures AssessmentModerate or lessGood
Specific pollutantsHighHigh
CopperHighHigh
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
NonylphenolGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Fail
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
FluorantheneGood
OctylphenolGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPerfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Details
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhytoplanktonDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhytoplanktonDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportPhytoplanktonDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (intermittent)Water IndustryPhytoplanktonDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Water IndustryMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (intermittent)Water IndustryTotal PhosphorusDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000010
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0010000
Water Industry0200000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0210010

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalModerate2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Biological quality elementsModerate2021Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedNot assessed2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
PhytoplanktonModerate2021Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
SalinityGood2015
Total NitrogenGood2027 - Low confidenceTechnically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
Total PhosphorusBad2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsNot assessed2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Expert JudgementGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
NonylphenolGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2039Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
FluorantheneGood2015
OctylphenolGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
LEE NVZS443Nitrates Directive
Walthamstow ReservoirsUKENLK171Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
Lee ValleyUK9012111Special Protection AreaNatural England
Lee ValleyUK11034Ramsar SiteNatural England
LeeSWSGZ4006Safeguard Zone
Walthamstow Reservoirs - GB30641900UKGB30641900Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
LOW MAYNARD RESERVOIR :WALTHAMSTOW PGWL01692014, 2012, 2009, 20132019, 2014, 2016, 2015, 20132019, 2022
155215 1552152019, 20162022, 2019
158152 15815220142016, 2019, 2015, 20142019

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies