King's Sedgemoor Drain - Henley Sluice to mouth Water Body Moderate ecological status
Get King's Sedgemoor Drain - Henley Sluice to mouth data Attributes Water Body ID GB108052021150 Water Body Type River Hydromorphological designation artificial NGR ST4081234025 Catchment area 115.601 km2 Catchment area 11560.058 ha Length 27.917 km Surveillance Water Body Yes Classifications Classification Item 2019 2022 Ecological Moderate Moderate Biological quality elements Poor Poor Fish Poor Poor Invertebrates Good Good Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined High High Macrophytes Sub Element Good Good Phytobenthos Sub Element High High Physico-chemical quality elements Moderate Moderate Acid Neutralising Capacity High High Ammonia (Phys-Chem) Good High Dissolved oxygen Poor Poor Phosphate Moderate Moderate Temperature Moderate High pH High High Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good Supports good Hydrological Regime Supports good Supports good Supporting elements (Surface Water) Moderate Moderate Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or less Moderate or less Specific pollutants High High Chlorothalonil High High Chromium (VI) High High Copper High High Iron High High Manganese High High Pendimethalin High High Zinc High High Chemical Fail Does not require assessment Priority hazardous substances Fail Does not require assessment Benzo(a)pyrene Good Benzo(b)fluoranthene Good Benzo(g-h-i)perylene Good Benzo(k)fluoranthene Good Cadmium and Its Compounds Good Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good Hexachlorobenzene Good Hexachlorobutadiene Good Hexachlorocyclohexane Good Mercury and Its Compounds Fail Nonylphenol Good Pentachlorobenzene Good Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Fail Quinoxyfen Good Tributyltin Compounds Good Priority substances Good Does not require assessment 1,2-dichloroethane Good Aclonifen Good Alachlor Good Benzene Good Bifenox Good Cybutryne Good Cypermethrin (Priority) Good Dichloromethane Good Fluoranthene Good Lead and Its Compounds Good Nickel and Its Compounds Good Trichloromethane Good Other Pollutants Good Does not require assessment Carbon Tetrachloride Good DDT Total Good para - para DDT Good
Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?
Investigations into classification status No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD) All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in
this water body.
Reason Type SWMI Activity Category Classification Element More information RNAG Point source Sewage discharge (continuous) Water Industry Phosphate Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor Livestock Management Agriculture and rural land management Phosphate Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Details RFD Method Change (RFD Only) Not applicable No sector responsible Temperature Details RFD Method Change (RFD Only) Not applicable No sector responsible Dissolved oxygen Details RNAG Physical modification Land drainage - structures Agriculture and rural land management Dissolved oxygen Details RNAG Physical modification Flood protection - water level management Sector under investigation Dissolved oxygen Details RNAG Point source Sewage discharge (continuous) Water Industry Dissolved oxygen Details RNAG Physical modification Other (not in list, must add details in comments) Urban and transport Mitigation Measures Assessment Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor Livestock Management Agriculture and rural land management Dissolved oxygen Details RNAG Physical modification Other (not in list, must add details in comments) Local and Central Government Mitigation Measures Assessment Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Mercury and Its Compounds Details RFD Suspect data Not applicable No sector responsible Fish Details RNAG Suspect data Not applicable No sector responsible Fish Details RNAG Physical modification Other (not in list, must add details in comments) Agriculture and rural land management Mitigation Measures Assessment Details
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors
identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are
individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a
confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest
classification is less than good status. There may be more than one
reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for
deterioration.
Significant water management issue Physical modifications Pollution from waste water Pollution from towns, cities and transport Changes to the natural flow and level of water Invasive non-native species Pollution from rural areas Pollution from abandoned mines Agriculture and rural land management 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mining and quarrying 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban and transport 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Industry 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Local & central government 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic general public 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waste treatment and disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No sector responsible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector under investigation 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 5 2 0 0 0 2 0
Objectives Classification Item Status Year Reasons Ecological Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Biological quality elements Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Fish Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Invertebrates Good 2015 Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good 2015 Physico-chemical quality elements Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Acid Neutralising Capacity Good 2015 Ammonia (Phys-Chem) Good 2015 Dissolved oxygen Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Phosphate Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Temperature Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens pH Good 2015 Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good 2015 Hydrological Regime Supports good 2015 Supporting elements (Surface Water) Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Mitigation Measures Assessment Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Specific pollutants High 2015 Chlorothalonil High 2015 Chromium (VI) High 2015 Copper High 2015 Iron High 2015 Manganese High 2015 Pendimethalin High 2015 Zinc High 2015 Chemical Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority hazardous substances Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Benzo(a)pyrene Good 2015 Benzo(b)fluoranthene Good 2015 Benzo(g-h-i)perylene Good 2015 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Good 2015 Cadmium and Its Compounds Good 2015 Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good 2015 Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good 2015 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good 2015 Hexachlorobenzene Good 2015 Hexachlorobutadiene Good 2015 Hexachlorocyclohexane Good 2015 Mercury and Its Compounds Good 2040 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Nonylphenol Good 2015 Pentachlorobenzene Good 2015 Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good 2015 Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Quinoxyfen Good 2015 Tributyltin Compounds Good 2015 Priority substances Good 2015 1,2-dichloroethane Good 2015 Aclonifen Good 2015 Alachlor Good 2015 Benzene Good 2015 Bifenox Good 2015 Cybutryne Good 2015 Cypermethrin (Priority) Good 2015 Dichloromethane Good 2015 Fluoranthene Good 2015 Lead and Its Compounds Good 2015 Nickel and Its Compounds Good 2015 Trichloromethane Good 2015 Other Pollutants Good 2015 Carbon Tetrachloride Good 2015 DDT Total Good 2015 para - para DDT Good 2015
Protected areas PA Name Id Directive More information Somerset Levels & Moors UK9010031 Special Protection Area Natural England Somerset Levels & Moors UK11064 Ramsar Site Natural England
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within
each cycle.
Monitoring Site Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 10275 10275 2015, 2016, 2019, 2014 2019 159912 159912 2014, 2013 2016, 2015, 2019, 2014, 2013 2019 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/KING'S SEDGEMOOR DRAIN/LANGACRE RHYNE/ 38749 2013, 2014 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/KING'S SEDGEMOOR DRAIN/U/S PARCHEY/ 39086 2013, 2014, 2012 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014 10273 10273 2012, 2010, 2013, 2011, 2009, 2014 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/MAIN RIVER PARRETT/SOWY RIVER/BEER WALL/ 26585 2013, 2014 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/MAIN RIVER PARRETT/SOWY RIVER/MONKSLEAZE CLYSE (TE)/ 16371 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014, 2019 2022, 2019 155059 155059 2011, 2014, 2013 2016, 2015, 2019, 2014, 2013 2019 KINGS SEDGMOOR DRAIN D/S GREYLAKE BRIDGE 60270173 2014 2015, 2014, 2016, 2019 2019 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/KING'S SEDGEMOOR DRAIN/U/S GREYLAKE SLUICE/ 25899 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014, 2019 2019 165423 165423 2016, 2015, 2019, 2014 2019 10274 10274 2014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 2011, 2009 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014, 2019 2019 SOMERSET AREA/RIVER PARRETT CATCHMENT/KING'S SEDGEMOOR DRAIN/D/S GREYLAKE SLUICE/ 26017 2015, 2016, 2019 2022, 2019 SOWY RIVER AT OTHERY 60270239 2015, 2016 KINGS SEDGMOOR DRAIN AT CRANDON BRIDGE 60270117 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 2009 2016, 2019, 2013, 2015, 2014 2019, 2022 R CARY KSD PARCHEY E5006300 2014, 2012, 2013 153914 153914 2011, 2013 KINGS SEDGMOOR DRAIN AT DUNBALL 1 60270102 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 2009 2013, 2015, 2014, 2016, 2019 2019 155049 155049 2011, 2013