Wade Brook Water Body

Poor ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB112068060370
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRSJ7476571990
  • Catchment area52.804 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Length27.545 km
  • Catchment area5280.41 ha

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalPoorPoor
Biological quality elementsPoorPoor
InvertebratesModerateModerate
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedPoorPoor
Macrophytes Sub ElementPoorPoor
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
Acid Neutralising CapacityHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)BadBad
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)Good
Dissolved oxygenHighHigh
PhosphateModerateModerate
TemperatureGoodHigh
pHHighHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports goodSupports good
Hydrological RegimeSupports goodSupports good
MorphologySupports goodSupports good
Specific pollutantsModerateModerate
2,4-dichlorophenolHighHigh
ArsenicHighHigh
CopperHighHigh
CyanideModerateModerate
IronHighHigh
ManganeseHighHigh
PhenolModerateModerate
ZincHighHigh
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Cadmium and Its CompoundsFail
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Lead and Its CompoundsGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
TrichlorobenzenesGood
TrichloromethaneFail
Other PollutantsGoodDoes not require assessment
Carbon TetrachlorideGood
TetrachloroethyleneGood
TrichloroethyleneGood

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)22014PoorQuite certain there is a problem
Zinc22015ModerateCertain there is not a problem
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)22016GoodQuite certain there is a problem

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryPhenolDetails
RFDHigh to Good deterioration, no action required (RFD only)Not applicableNo sector responsibleTemperatureDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryInvertebratesDetails
RNAGInvasive non-native speciesNorth american signal crayfishNo sector responsibleInvertebratesDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPoint sourceLandfill leachingIndustryTrichloromethaneDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGDiffuse sourceContaminated landIndustryCyanideDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryCyanideDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationCadmium and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGPoint sourceFarm/site infrastructureAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPoint sourceFarm/site infrastructureAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RFDMonitoring Site Changed (RFD only)Not applicableNo sector responsibleAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management00000100
Industry0060000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total00600100

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
InvertebratesGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
2,4-dichlorophenolHigh2015
ArsenicHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
CyanideHigh2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
PhenolHigh2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
ZincHigh2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
ChemicalGood2063Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Lead and Its CompoundsGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
TrichlorobenzenesGood2015
TrichloromethaneGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Other PollutantsGood2015
Carbon TetrachlorideGood2015
TetrachloroethyleneGood2015
TrichloroethyleneGood2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
River Weaver (Dane to Frodsham) NVZS636Nitrates Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
WADE BROOK BELOW LOSTOCK PERMITTED SITES 880008572013, 2012, 2011, 2009, 20142013, 2016, 2015, 2019, 20142022, 2019
67216 672162010, 2009, 2011, 20142016, 2019, 2014, 20152019
WADE BROOK ABOVE ICI WADE WORKS 8800085620092015, 20162022
CROW BROOK AT PORTFORD BRIDGE 8800085420092015, 20162022
WINCHAM BROOK ABOVE CONFLUENCE WEAVER 880008602015, 2019, 20162022, 2019
WEAVER/WINCHAM BROOK/WADE BROOK/WNWA05/ 159322010, 2011, 2009
160698 16069820142015, 2014, 2016, 20192019
WINCHAM BROOK AT CRANAGE PUMPING STATION 8800085020142014, 2015, 2016

Downstream water bodies