Crowton Brook Water Body
Poor ecological status
Get Crowton Brook data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB112068060550
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
- NGRSJ5776974753
- Catchment area27.594 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyYes
- Length4.692 km
- Catchment area2759.38 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
Ecological | Poor | Poor |
Biological quality elements | Poor | Poor |
Fish | Poor | Poor |
Invertebrates | Good | Good |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | Good |
Macrophytes Sub Element | Good | Good |
Phytobenthos Sub Element | Good | Good |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | High | High |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Poor | Good |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) | High | |
Dissolved oxygen | High | High |
Phosphate | Bad | Poor |
Temperature | High | High |
pH | High | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | Supports good |
Morphology | Supports good | Supports good |
Specific pollutants | High | High |
Chromium (VI) | High | High |
Copper | High | High |
Iron | High | High |
Manganese | High | High |
Pendimethalin | High | High |
Zinc | High | High |
Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good | |
Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Fail | |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
Hexachlorocyclohexane | Good | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail | |
Nonylphenol | Good | |
Pentachlorobenzene | Good | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Fail | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
Quinoxyfen | Good | |
Tributyltin Compounds | Good | |
Priority substances | Good | Does not require assessment |
1,2-dichloroethane | Good | |
Aclonifen | Good | |
Alachlor | Good | |
Benzene | Good | |
Bifenox | Good | |
Cybutryne | Good | |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | |
Dichloromethane | Good | |
Dichlorvos (Priority) | Good | |
Fluoranthene | Good | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | |
Terbutryn | Good | |
Trichloromethane | Good | |
Other Pollutants | Good | Does not require assessment |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good | |
DDT Total | Good | |
para - para DDT | Good |
Investigations into classification status
Classification Element | Cycle | Year | Status | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | 2 | 2016 | Moderate | Quite certain there is a problem |
Hydrological Regime | 2 | 2016 | Does Not Support Good | Certain there is not a problem |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Details |
RFD | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RFD | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Farm/site infrastructure | Agriculture and rural land management | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RFD | Flow | Surface water abstraction | Industry | Hydrological Regime | Details |
RFD | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Fish | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Farm/site infrastructure | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Domestic General Public | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Domestic General Public | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Sector under investigation | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Private Sewage Treatment | Sector under investigation | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Suspect data | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Hydrological Regime | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Biological quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Fish | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Invertebrates | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | Good | 2015 | |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2021 | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Specific pollutants | High | 2015 | |
Chromium (VI) | High | 2015 | |
Copper | High | 2015 | |
Iron | High | 2015 | |
Manganese | High | 2015 | |
Pendimethalin | High | 2015 | |
Zinc | High | 2015 | |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Good | 2033 | Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorocyclohexane | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Nonylphenol | Good | 2015 | |
Pentachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2039 | Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Quinoxyfen | Good | 2015 | |
Tributyltin Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
1,2-dichloroethane | Good | 2015 | |
Aclonifen | Good | 2015 | |
Alachlor | Good | 2015 | |
Benzene | Good | 2015 | |
Bifenox | Good | 2015 | |
Cybutryne | Good | 2015 | |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Dichloromethane | Good | 2015 | |
Dichlorvos (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Terbutryn | Good | 2015 | |
Trichloromethane | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Good | 2015 | |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good | 2015 | |
DDT Total | Good | 2015 | |
para - para DDT | Good | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
River Weaver (Dane to Frodsham) NVZ | S636 | Nitrates Directive | |
Midland Meres & Mosses - Phase 1 | UK11043 | Ramsar Site | Natural England |
Delamere Sands | G45 | Nitrates Directive |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.