Avon (Brist) conf Tetbury Avon to conf R Marden Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB109053027650
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRST9764782765
  • Catchment area60.83 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Length23.99 km
  • Catchment area6083.0 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalModerate
Biological quality elementsModerate
FishGood
InvertebratesGood
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedModerate
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate
Acid Neutralising CapacityHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)High
Dissolved oxygenGood
PhosphateModerate
TemperatureGood
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support good
MorphologySupports good
Specific pollutantsHigh
ArsenicHigh
CopperHigh
IronHigh
ManganeseHigh
ZincHigh
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGood
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Lead and Its CompoundsGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
Other PollutantsGood
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & IsodrinGood
para - para DDTGood

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationHydrological RegimeDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryHydrological RegimeDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0200000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0200000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2015
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Acid Neutralising CapacityGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support good2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
ArsenicHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
ZincHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo (b) and (k) fluorantheneGood2015
Benzo (ghi) perelyene and indeno (123-cd) pyreneGood2015
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Lead and Its CompoundsGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
Other PollutantsGood2015
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & IsodrinGood2015
para - para DDTGood2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Tetbury Avon - unnamed trib to conf Sherston Avon NVZS576Nitrates Directive
Brinkworth Bk- Hancocks Wtr to conf R Avon (Brist) NVZS575Nitrates Directive
Upper Bristol AvonUKENRI115Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
AVON SOMERFORD Z10124012011, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, 20132015, 2016, 2014, 2019, 20132019
AVON WESTPORT Z50128022011, 2009, 2010
BRISTOL AVON CATCHMENT/BRISTOL AVON MAIN RIVER/RAWLINGS FARM (TE)/ 104532011, 2009, 2012, 2010
160941 16094120142016, 2015, 2019, 20142019
7814 78142011, 2010, 2009
7777 77772011, 2014, 2010, 20092015, 2016, 2019, 20142019
BRISTOL AVON D/S DAUNTSEY WEIR Z10123012011, 2009, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010
AVON MALMESBURY Z10127012009, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010, 2011
7850 78502011, 2014, 2010, 20092015, 2016, 2019, 20142019
160942 16094220142016, 2015, 2019, 20142019
BRISTOL AVON CATCHMENT/BRISTOL AVON MAIN RIVER/GREAT SOMERFORD (TE)/ 68212011, 2009, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20132016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019
7778 77782011, 2010, 2014, 20092015, 2016, 2019, 20142019
BRISTOL AVON U/S SUTTON BENGER STW Z10123402009, 2014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 20112016, 2014, 2015, 2013
160943 16094320142016, 2015, 2019, 20142019
7771 77712011, 2010, 2009
AVON COWBRIDGE Z10126012009, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010, 20112015, 2016, 2014, 2013
BRISTOL AVON CATCHMENT/BRISTOL AVON MAIN RIVER/CHRISTIAN MALFORD (TE)/ 33822011, 2009, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20132016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019
BRISTOL AVON AT MALFORD CHURCH Z10123232009, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010, 20112015, 2016, 2014, 2013
151362 1513622010, 2011