Mimram (Whitwell to Codicote Bottom) Water Body
Moderate ecological status
Get Mimram (Whitwell to Codicote Bottom) data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB106038033460
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
- NGRTL1882821079
- Catchment area4876.991 ha
- Length6.413 km
- Catchment area48.77 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
Ecological | Moderate | Moderate |
Biological quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
Fish | Good | Good |
Invertebrates | High | High |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Moderate | Moderate |
Macrophytes Sub Element | Moderate | Moderate |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High | High |
Dissolved oxygen | High | High |
Phosphate | Poor | Poor |
Temperature | High | High |
pH | High | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Does not support good | Does not support good |
Morphology | Supports good | Supports good |
Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
Priority substances | Good | Does not require assessment |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | |
Fluoranthene | Good | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Riparian/in-river activities (inc bankside erosion) | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Invasive non-native species | Other riparian plants | No sector responsible | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Hydrological Regime | Details |
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Reservoir / Impoundment - non flow related | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Reservoir / Impoundment - non flow related | Other | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Suspect data | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Transport Drainage | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Track/rural road | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phosphate | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Biological quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Fish | Good | 2015 | |
Invertebrates | Good | 2015 | |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Specific pollutants | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
LEE NVZ | S443 | Nitrates Directive | |
Luton Chalk | G146 | Nitrates Directive |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.