Wey (Tilford to Shalford) Water Body
Poor ecological status
Get Wey (Tilford to Shalford) data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB106039017820
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
- NGRSU8874243435
- Catchment area63.274 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Length23.332 km
- Catchment area6327.391 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
Ecological | Poor | Poor |
Biological quality elements | Poor | Poor |
Fish | Poor | Poor |
Invertebrates | High | High |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Moderate | Moderate |
Macrophytes Sub Element | Good | Good |
Phytobenthos Sub Element | Moderate | Moderate |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High | High |
Dissolved oxygen | High | High |
Phosphate | Moderate | Moderate |
Temperature | High | High |
pH | High | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | Supports good |
Morphology | Supports good | Supports good |
Specific pollutants | High | High |
Chromium (VI) | High | High |
Copper | High | High |
Iron | High | High |
Zinc | High | High |
Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good | |
Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Fail | |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
Priority substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Fail | |
Fluoranthene | Good | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RFD | Suspect data | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Invasive non-native species | North american signal crayfish | No sector responsible | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Reservoir / Impoundment - non flow related | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Reservoir / Impoundment - non flow related | Navigation | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Barriers - ecological discontinuity | Other | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Reservoir / Impoundment - non flow related | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2039 | Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Biological quality elements | Good | 2039 | Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time |
Fish | Good | 2033 | Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time |
Invertebrates | Good | 2015 | |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2039 | Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2027 | Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2027 | Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Specific pollutants | High | 2015 | |
Chromium (VI) | High | 2015 | |
Copper | High | 2015 | |
Iron | High | 2015 | |
Zinc | High | 2015 | |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Good | 2033 | Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority substances | Good | 2039 | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2039 | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
Lower Thames (Cookham Egham Teddington) | SWSGZ4016 | Safeguard Zone | |
Wey | SWSGZ4015 | Safeguard Zone | |
Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham | UK0012793 | Special Area of Conservation | Natural England |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.