Welbeck Great Lake Water Body
Poor ecological status
Get Welbeck Great Lake data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB30433100
- Water Body TypeLake
- Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
- NGRSK5813472574
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Surface area59.196 ha
- Altitude46 m
- Mean depth2 m
- Surface area0.592 km2
- Catchment area8281.75 ha
Classifications
| Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological | Poor | Poor |
| Biological quality elements | Poor | Poor |
| Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Poor | Poor |
| Macrophytes Sub Element | Poor | Poor |
| Phytoplankton | Moderate | Good |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
| Salinity | Moderate | Moderate |
| Total Nitrogen | Bad | Bad |
| Total Phosphorus | Bad | Bad |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
| Hydrological Regime | Supports good | Supports good |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | Good |
| Expert Judgement | Good | Good |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | Good |
| Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
| Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail | |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
| Priority substances | Good | Does not require assessment |
| Fluoranthene | Good | |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
| Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
| RNAG | Other pressures | Saline or other intrusion | Mining and quarrying | Salinity | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Total Phosphorus | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Total Phosphorus | Details |
| RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phytoplankton | Details |
| RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phytoplankton | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
| Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Water Industry | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Objectives
| Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological | Moderate | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Biological quality elements | Moderate | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Moderate | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Phytoplankton | Moderate | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Salinity | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Total Nitrogen | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Total Phosphorus | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2015 | |
| Expert Judgement | Good | 2015 | |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2015 | |
| Specific pollutants | Not assessed | 2015 | |
| Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
| Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
| PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottinghamshire | G40 | Nitrates Directive | |
| River Idle from River Ryton to River Trent NVZ | S335 | Nitrates Directive | |
| Clumber Lake & Welbeck Great Lake Eutrophic lake NVZ | EL125 | Nitrates Directive |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.