Felixstowe Peninsula Crag & Chalk Water Body
Poor overall status
Get Felixstowe Peninsula Crag & Chalk data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB40501G401800
- Water Body TypeGroundwater Body
- Hydromorphological designationnot applicable
- NGRTM2280043018
- Surface area122.435 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Groundwater area12243.488 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 |
---|---|
Overall Water Body | Poor |
Quantitative | Poor |
Quantitative Status element | Poor |
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body Status | Good |
Quantitative GWDTEs test | Good |
Quantitative Saline Intrusion | Good |
Quantitative Water Balance | Poor |
Chemical (GW) | Poor |
Chemical Status element | Poor |
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body Status | Good |
Chemical Drinking Water Protected Area | Good |
Chemical GWDTEs test | Poor |
Chemical Saline Intrusion | Good |
General Chemical Test | Poor |
Supporting elements (Groundwater) | |
Prevent and Limit Objective | Active |
Trend Assessment | Upward trend |
Investigations into classification status
No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | General Chemical Test | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | General Chemical Test | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Farm/site infrastructure | Agriculture and rural land management | General Chemical Test | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Water Body | Poor | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Quantitative | Good | 2015 | |
Quantitative Status element | Good | 2015 | |
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body Status | Good | 2015 | |
Quantitative GWDTEs test | Good | 2015 | |
Quantitative Saline Intrusion | Good | 2015 | |
Quantitative Water Balance | Good | 2015 | |
Chemical (GW) | Poor | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Chemical Status element | Poor | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body Status | Good | 2015 | |
Chemical Drinking Water Protected Area | Good | 2015 | |
Chemical GWDTEs test | Good | 2015 | |
Chemical Saline Intrusion | Good | 2015 | |
General Chemical Test | Poor | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
Sandlings and Chelmsford | G78 | Nitrates Directive | |
Deben Estuary | UK9009261 | Special Protection Area | Natural England |
Deben Estuary | UK11017 | Ramsar Site | Natural England |
River Gipping NVZ | S416 | Nitrates Directive | |
Stour And Orwell Estuaries | UK9009121 | Special Protection Area | Natural England |
Lark/Fynn NVZ | S407 | Nitrates Directive | |
Stour And Orwell Estuaries | UK11067 | Ramsar Site | Natural England |
Bucklesham Mill River NVZ | S405 | Nitrates Directive | |
Felixstowe Peninsula Crag & Chalk | UKGB40501G401800 | Drinking Water Protected Area |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.