Upper Bedford Ouse Woburn Sands Water Body

Poor overall status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB40501G402200
  • Water Body TypeGroundwater Body
  • Hydromorphological designationnot applicable
  • NGRTL0929239941
  • Surface area220.946 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Groundwater area22094.557 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
Overall Water BodyPoor
QuantitativePoor
Quantitative Status elementPoor
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusPoor
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood
Quantitative Water BalanceGood
Chemical (GW)Good
Chemical Status elementGood
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaGood
Chemical GWDTEs testGood
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood
General Chemical TestGood
Supporting elements (Groundwater)
Prevent and Limit ObjectiveActive
Trend AssessmentUpward trend

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
General Chemical Test22019GoodVery certain there is a problem

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceGroundwaterAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceOther (not in list, must add details in comments)OtherGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Water BalanceDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceGroundwaterAgriculture and rural land managementChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0001000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0001000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
Overall Water BodyPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
QuantitativeGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Status elementGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood2015
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood2015
Quantitative Water BalanceGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical (GW)Poor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical Status elementPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaGood2015
Chemical GWDTEs testGood2015
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood2015
General Chemical TestPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Great Ouse NVZS391Nitrates Directive
Ely Ouse and Cut-off channel NVZS390Nitrates Directive
Huntingdon River GravelsG144Nitrates Directive
Woburn SandsG76Nitrates Directive
Stewartby Lake Eutrophic lake NVZEL111Nitrates Directive
Upper Bedford Ouse Woburn SandsUKGB40501G402200Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies