Don Lower Operational Catchment

About

The Lower Don to the north and east of Doncaster has many heavily modified and managed rivers. Some are pumped into the Don and their lower reaches are semi impounded. Swinefleet Warping Drain is an artificial waterbody which is pumped into the Ouse and Bentley Mill Stream is managed by pumping stations. The Ea Beck and Went flow into the tidal Lower Don. Their lower reaches are tide locked. The key issues include point source pollution, physical modifications and rural diffuse pollution. Areas of high value habitat include Went Ings Meadows and Thorne & Hatfield lowland moor which are SSSIs.

View of Don Lower operational catchment

Classifications data for Don Lower Operational Catchment

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers35816
Lake0000
Coastal0000
Estuarine0000
Groundwater0000
Total35816

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies02140016
Number of water body elements52172186140

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies16016
Number of water body elements46202248

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies000
Number of water body elements000

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies000
Number of water body elements000

Challenges data for Don Lower Operational Catchment

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management10901900
Domestic general public0000050
Industry0000070
Local & central government00140000
Mining and quarrying0002000
Navigation0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Other0000000
Recreation0000000
Sector under investigation0020000
Urban and transport0060070
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Water Industry00000030
Total10312191930

Objectives data for Don Lower Operational Catchment

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 2015003003
By 202700013013
Total00313016

13 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 206301616
Total01616

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
Total000

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
Total000

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Summary Statistics data for Don Lower Operational Catchment

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential0%0%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status70%70%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better81%81%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or better90%90%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status81%81%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT94%94%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBTGreater than 99%Greater than 99%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%