Summary statistics data for Rother and Doe Lea Operational Catchment
Ecological status and potential
| Summary statistic | Rivers, Canals and SWTs | Lakes | Estuaries | Coastal | Surface Waters Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential | 6% | 0% | 5% | ||
| % of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status | 74% | 74% | |||
| % of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better | 67% | 100% | 68% | ||
| % of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or better | 88% | 88% |
Chemical
| Summary statistic | Rivers, Canals and SWTs | Lakes | Estuaries | Coastal | Surface Waters Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of water bodies at good chemical status | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| % of chemical elements at good status | 73% | 70% | 73% | ||
| % of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT | 44% | 100% | 47% | ||
| % of chemical elements at good status without uPBT | 91% | 100% | 91% | ||
| % of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| % of chemical elements with an objective of good | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| % of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| % of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs | 100% | 100% | 100% |