Humber River Basin District

About

The Humber river basin district covers an area of 26,100km2 and extends from the West Midlands in the south, northwards to North Yorkshire and from Staffordshire in the west to part of Lincolnshire and the Humber Estuary in the east. In total more than 10.8 million people live and work in towns and cities within the district, with the main urban centres being Birmingham, Leeds, Bradford, Sheffield, Hull and Grimsby. The Humber river basin district has a rich diversity of wildlife and habitats, supporting many species of global and national importance. The management catchments that make up the river basin district include many interconnected rivers, lakes, groundwater and coastal waters. The catchments range from the uplands of the Peak District to fertile river valleys of the Trent to chalk aquifers of the Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Wolds and vary from rural catchments to others heavily influenced by urban and industrial land use. The main economic sectors in the region include business services, health, wholesale and distribution. Manufacturing contributes to the economy along with some mineral abstraction, including some deep coal mines, potash mines and numerous gravel workings. Agriculture is critical for the rural economy of the district and supports natural and cultural assets that help underpin both the region's tourism and quality of life for those who live and work in the district.

Photograph of the River Aire from Leeds Bridge in Leeds

Classifications data for Humber River Basin District

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers468104271843
Lake1218103133
Coastal0022
Estuarine1247
Groundwater510051
Total5321243801036

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies271596461500982
Number of water body elements1555491077117855138472

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies9820982
Number of water body elements24471117013617

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies104151
Number of water body elements15189204

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies262551
Number of water body elements41214255

Challenges data for Humber River Basin District

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management210223072102
Domestic general public004001076
Industry503900613
Local & central government002120001
Mining and quarrying00271030
Navigation40150010
No sector responsible0900000
Other30240030
Recreation00140050
Sector under investigation10450000
Urban and transport00211002940
Waste treatment and disposal00000130
Water Industry490143000789
Total83993271721487801

Objectives data for Humber River Basin District

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 20151101791330323
By 20210103938087
By 202703355320570
By 2033000202
Total1232537050982

556 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 20630982982
Total0982982

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 201593847
By 2021044
Total94251

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 201572633
By 2021066
By 202701010
By 2050011
By 2060011
Total74451

10 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Protected Areas data for Humber River Basin District

Drinking water protected areas current status and at risk

Water body typeNumber of drinking water protected areasNumber ‘at risk’Number at poor chemical status for drinking water protected area objectives
Surface water11967Does not apply to surface waters
Groundwater512414

Shellfish water protected areas current status and objectives

No data to show

Bathing water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of bathing watersObjectiveNumber which met at least the sufficient classification in 2021Number expected to achieve at least sufficient in 2022Number at risk of not achieving sufficient in 2022
23At least sufficient classification21193

There are 1 unassessed bathing waters

Nutrient sensitive areas (nitrate vulnerable zones)

Reason for designationNumber of NVZsLand area (ha) covered by NVZ type% of river basin district covered by NVZ type
High nitrates in surface waters1061,488,18857
High nitrates in groundwater21529,95420
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs757,9032

Nutrient sensitive areas (Urban Waste Water Treatment Regulations)

Reason for designationNumber of Sensitive areasLength (KM)/Area (km2) designated
Eutrophication in rivers261302
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs64.15
Eutrophication in canals3100
High nitrate in surface fresh water127.00

Habitats site (European site) protected areas*

Site typeNumber of sites
Ramsar Site5
Special Area of Conservation27
Special Protection Area9

Condition of underlying water-dependent Site of Special Scientific Interest units**

RBMP water-dependent conditionUnit area (ha)% of total unit area
RBMP-Favourable (Compliant)13,26212.0
RBMP-Unfavourable - Recovering94,45585.2
RBMP-Unfavourable - No change2,6572.4
RBMP-Unfavourable - Declining5270.5
RBMP-Partially destroyed00.0
RBMP-Destroyed00.0
RBMP-Not Recorded00.0

Download European Sites target data

*Ramsar sites are not protected areas under the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2017. However they are treated in line with Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA) as a matter of Government policy. Most Ramsar sites coincide with SACs and/or SPAs, but a small number are designated as Ramsar sites only. These are included in the water-dependent site condition data.

**Includes SSSI units underlying European sites and Ramsar sites where the habitat is water-dependent. The "RBMP-favourable" category in these tables includes units where any reasons for not being in "favourable condition", as far as can be ascertained, do not relate to the water-dependent features. As a result, all condition categories have the prefix "RBMP" to distinguish these from conventional SSSI condition reporting, in which pressures not relevant to river basin planning are included in determining site condition. Data retrieved 2019. Methodology changes mean this data does not form a continuous series with data reported in 2015.

Summary Statistics data for Humber River Basin District

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential16%9%29%0%15%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status78%58%89%100%78%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better73%64%57%100%72%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or better93%86%96%100%93%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%0%0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status83%75%84%82%82%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT91%100%57%100%92%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBT98%100%97%100%98%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%98%100%100%Greater than 99%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%100%100%100%

Groundwater

Summary statisticGround water
% of water bodies at good chemical (GW) status49%
% of groundwater chemical elements at good status84%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical (GW) status86%
% of groundwater chemical elements with an objective of good96%
% of water bodies at good quantitative status80%
% of groundwater quantitative elements at good status93%
% of water bodies with an objective of good quantitative status82%
% of groundwater quantitative elements with an objective of good93%