Anglian River Basin District

About

The Anglian river basin district covers 27,900km2 and extends from Lincolnshire in the north to Essex in the south and from Northamptonshire in the west to the east Anglian coast. In total over 7.1 million people live and work within the district and it includes the urban centres of Lincoln, Northampton, Milton Keynes and Chelmsford. The Anglian river basin district has a rich diversity of wildlife and habitats, supporting many species of global and national importance. It is recognised as a rich region for wetland wildlife, with the Norfolk Broads being Britain's largest nationally protected wetland and is important for wintering wildfowl. The management catchments that make up the river basin district include many interconnected rivers, lakes, groundwater and coastal waters. These range from chalk and limestone ridges to the extensive lowlands of the Fens and East Anglian coastal estuaries and marshes. The river basin district is a predominantly rural catchment, with more than 50% of land used for agriculture and horticulture. East Anglia is a tourist destination, particularly for water recreation including boaters, beach goers and anglers. The Norfolk Broads contributes significantly to the economy of the district.

Photograph of a waterway in the Norfolk Broads

Classifications data for Anglian River Basin District

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers17541306522
Lake10191746
Coastal41813
Estuarine301518
Groundwater310031
Total22361346630

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies21103428470599
Number of water body elements11040565882631245123

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies5990599
Number of water body elements119769978194

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies141731
Number of water body elements15109124

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies151631
Number of water body elements23132155

Challenges data for Anglian River Basin District

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management470234079110
Domestic general public00100144
Industry70700383
Local & central government401860004
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation00180000
No sector responsible04320020
Other30600004
Recreation00350010
Sector under investigation10460000
Urban and transport0048001140
Waste treatment and disposal0000010
Water Industry38015001486
Total100436520791172501

Objectives data for Anglian River Basin District

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 2015113187500251
By 2021011020031
By 202702282820312
By 2033000202
By 2060000303
Total1162253570599

291 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 20630599599
Total0599599

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 201511415
By 2021055
By 202701111
Total13031

7 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 2015111425
By 2021011
By 2027033
By 2033011
By 2060011
Total112031

3 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Protected Areas data for Anglian River Basin District

Drinking water protected areas current status and at risk

Water body typeNumber of drinking water protected areasNumber ‘at risk’Number at poor chemical status for drinking water protected area objectives
Surface water3731Does not apply to surface waters
Groundwater31159

Shellfish water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of shellfish watersObjectiveNumber currently achieving standardNumber not sampled due to lack of commercial activity
22Endeavour to observe the Shellfish Directions standard of ≤300 E.coli/100ml shellfish flesh and intravalvular liquid52

Bathing water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of bathing watersObjectiveNumber which met at least the sufficient classification in 2021Number expected to achieve at least sufficient in 2022Number at risk of not achieving sufficient in 2022
39At least sufficient classification38372

There are 0 unassessed bathing waters

Nutrient sensitive areas (nitrate vulnerable zones)

Reason for designationNumber of NVZsLand area (ha) covered by NVZ type% of river basin district covered by NVZ type
High nitrates in surface waters792,077,75875
High nitrates in groundwater211,340,87648
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs11189,3197

Nutrient sensitive areas (Urban Waste Water Treatment Regulations)

Reason for designationNumber of Sensitive areasLength (KM)/Area (km2) designated
Eutrophication in rivers241483
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs1333.56
High nitrate in surface fresh water7580

Habitats site (European site) protected areas*

Site typeNumber of sites
Ramsar Site28
Special Area of Conservation26
Special Protection Area26

Condition of underlying water-dependent Site of Special Scientific Interest units**

RBMP water-dependent conditionUnit area (ha)% of total unit area
RBMP-Favourable (Compliant)72,50974.7
RBMP-Unfavourable - Recovering19,25619.8
RBMP-Unfavourable - No change3,3733.5
RBMP-Unfavourable - Declining1,9222.0
RBMP-Partially destroyed50.0
RBMP-Destroyed80.0
RBMP-Not Recorded00.0

Download European Sites target data

*Ramsar sites are not protected areas under the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2017. However they are treated in line with Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA) as a matter of Government policy. Most Ramsar sites coincide with SACs and/or SPAs, but a small number are designated as Ramsar sites only. These are included in the water-dependent site condition data.

**Includes SSSI units underlying European sites and Ramsar sites where the habitat is water-dependent. The "RBMP-favourable" category in these tables includes units where any reasons for not being in "favourable condition", as far as can be ascertained, do not relate to the water-dependent features. As a result, all condition categories have the prefix "RBMP" to distinguish these from conventional SSSI condition reporting, in which pressures not relevant to river basin planning are included in determining site condition. Data retrieved 2019. Methodology changes mean this data does not form a continuous series with data reported in 2015.

Summary Statistics data for Anglian River Basin District

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential7%13%0%15%8%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status75%59%75%75%74%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better61%63%17%31%60%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or better90%91%88%86%90%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%0%0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status85%85%87%85%85%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT97%100%100%100%97%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBTGreater than 99%100%100%100%Greater than 99%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%100%100%100%

Groundwater

Summary statisticGround water
% of water bodies at good chemical (GW) status52%
% of groundwater chemical elements at good status85%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical (GW) status65%
% of groundwater chemical elements with an objective of good90%
% of water bodies at good quantitative status55%
% of groundwater quantitative elements at good status88%
% of water bodies with an objective of good quantitative status97%
% of groundwater quantitative elements with an objective of goodGreater than 99%