Ancholme from Bishopbridge to the Humber Water Body
Moderate ecological status
Get Ancholme from Bishopbridge to the Humber data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB104029067520
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationartificial
- NGRSE9935914602
- Catchment area206.714 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyYes
- Length54.779 km
- Catchment area20671.411 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 |
---|---|
Ecological | Moderate |
Biological quality elements | Moderate |
Fish | Moderate |
Invertebrates | High |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | High |
Macrophytes Sub Element | Poor |
Phytobenthos Sub Element | High |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | High |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High |
Dissolved oxygen | High |
Phosphate | Moderate |
Temperature | High |
pH | High |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Moderate |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Moderate or less |
Specific pollutants | High |
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid | High |
Arsenic | High |
Carbendazim | High |
Chlorothalonil | High |
Copper | High |
Diazinon | High |
Dimethoate | High |
Glyphosate | High |
Iron | High |
Linuron | High |
Manganese | High |
Mecoprop | High |
Pendimethalin | High |
Permethrin | High |
Zinc | High |
Chemical | Fail |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good |
Hexachlorocyclohexane | Good |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail |
Pentachlorobenzene | Good |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail |
Quinoxyfen | Good |
Trifluralin (Priority hazardous) | Good |
Priority substances | Good |
1,2-dichloroethane | Good |
Aclonifen | Good |
Alachlor | Good |
Atrazine | Good |
Bifenox | Good |
Chlorfenvinphos | Good |
Chlorpyrifos | Good |
Cybutryne | Good |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good |
Dichlorvos (Priority) | Good |
Diuron | Good |
Fluoranthene | Good |
Isoproturon | Good |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good |
Pentachlorophenol | Good |
Simazine | Good |
Terbutryn | Good |
Trichloromethane | Good |
Other Pollutants | Good |
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & Isodrin | Good |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good |
Trichloroethylene | Good |
para - para DDT | Good |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFD | Suspect data | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Inland boating and structures | Navigation | Fish | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Flood protection - water level management | Local and Central Government | Fish | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Barriers - ecological discontinuity | Local and Central Government | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Agriculture and rural land management | Mitigation Measures Assessment | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Local and Central Government | Mitigation Measures Assessment | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Flood protection - structures | Local and Central Government | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phosphate | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Moderate | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Biological quality elements | Good | 2015 | |
Fish | Good | 2015 | |
Invertebrates | Good | 2015 | |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2015 | |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | Good | 2015 | |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Moderate | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Specific pollutants | High | 2015 | |
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid | High | 2015 | |
Arsenic | High | 2015 | |
Carbendazim | High | 2015 | |
Chlorothalonil | High | 2015 | |
Copper | High | 2015 | |
Diazinon | High | 2015 | |
Dimethoate | High | 2015 | |
Glyphosate | High | 2015 | |
Iron | High | 2015 | |
Linuron | High | 2015 | |
Manganese | High | 2015 | |
Mecoprop | High | 2015 | |
Pendimethalin | High | 2015 | |
Permethrin | High | 2015 | |
Zinc | High | 2015 | |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Benzo (b) and (k) fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo (ghi) perelyene and indeno (123-cd) pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Endosulfan | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorocyclohexane | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Pentachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Quinoxyfen | Good | 2015 | |
Trifluralin (Priority hazardous) | Good | 2015 | |
Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
1,2-dichloroethane | Good | 2015 | |
Aclonifen | Good | 2015 | |
Alachlor | Good | 2015 | |
Atrazine | Good | 2015 | |
Bifenox | Good | 2015 | |
Chlorfenvinphos | Good | 2015 | |
Chlorpyrifos | Good | 2015 | |
Cybutryne | Good | 2015 | |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Dichlorvos (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Diuron | Good | 2015 | |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Isoproturon | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Pentachlorophenol | Good | 2015 | |
Simazine | Good | 2015 | |
Terbutryn | Good | 2015 | |
Trichloromethane | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Good | 2015 | |
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & Isodrin | Good | 2015 | |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good | 2015 | |
Trichloroethylene | Good | 2015 | |
para - para DDT | Good | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
Lincolnshire Limestone | G69 | Nitrates Directive | |
River Ancholme | SWSGZ1000 | Safeguard Zone | |
Ancholme from Bishopbridge to the Humber NVZ | S356 | Nitrates Directive | |
Humber Estuary | UK9006111 | Special Protection Area | Natural England |
Humber Estuary | UK11031 | Ramsar Site | Natural England |
Humber Estuary | UK0030170 | Special Area of Conservation | Natural England |
Ancholme from Bishopbridge to the Humber | UKGB104029067520 | Drinking Water Protected Area |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.