Lune - conf Rawthey to conf Greta Water Body

Good ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB112072071690
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRSD6167383161
  • Catchment area71.671 km2
  • Catchment area7167.134 ha
  • Length42.225 km
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalGood
Biological quality elementsGood
FishGood
InvertebratesHigh
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood
Phytobenthos Sub ElementGood
Physico-chemical quality elementsHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)High
Dissolved oxygenHigh
PhosphateHigh
TemperatureHigh
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeHigh
MorphologySupports good
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Fail
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGood
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPerfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Details
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0000000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2015
Biological quality elementsGood2015
FishGood2015
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2015
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2015
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsNot assessed2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2039Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

No data to show

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
RIVER LUNE AT RIGMADEN 880039722011, 2012, 2010, 20092015, 2016
RIVER LUNE/LECK BECK/NETHER BURROW/ 81422010, 2009
RIVER LUNE/SPRINGS GHYLL-ABOVE FALLS (STOCKING)/ 160932009
RIVER LUNE/STOCKDALE BECK/NEAR MIDDLETON/ 4258520142014, 2015, 2016, 20192019
63596 6359620142016, 2015, 2014
LUNE AT KIRBY LONSDALE DEVILS BRIDGE 880039742011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 20092014, 2015, 2013, 2016
RIVER LUNE/MIDDLETON HALL BECK/FELLSIDE - SITE 1 (HYDRO SCHEME)/ 325292012, 2010, 2013, 2011
RIVER LUNE/MIDDLETON HALL BECK/HABITAT IMPROVEMENT SITE/ 315902010, 2011, 2009
RIVER LUNE/ABBEY BECK (MILLHOUSE BECK)/ABBEY BECK A683 ROAD BRIDGE/ 3159420142014
RIVER LUNE/UNDERLEY D/S BRIDGE/ 1140420142014, 2015, 2016, 20192019
RIVER LUNE/U/S AQUADUCT AT HIGH HOUSE WOOD/ 817620142014, 2015, 2016, 20192019
RIVER LUNE/MIDDLETON HALL BECK/FELLSIDE - SITE 2 (HYDRO SCHEME)/ 325362012, 2010, 2013, 2011
RIVER LUNE/AIKRIGG BECK (STOCKING)/ 160902009

Downstream water bodies