North West Norfolk Chalk Water Body

Poor overall status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB40501G400200
  • Water Body TypeGroundwater Body
  • Hydromorphological designationnot applicable
  • NGRTF7701335373
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Surface area366.317 km2
  • Groundwater area36631.7 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
Overall Water BodyPoor
QuantitativePoor
Quantitative Status elementPoor
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusPoor
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood
Quantitative Water BalanceGood
Chemical (GW)Poor
Chemical Status elementPoor
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaPoor
Chemical GWDTEs testGood
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood
General Chemical TestPoor
Supporting elements (Groundwater)
Prevent and Limit ObjectiveActive
Trend AssessmentUpward trend

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (intermittent)Domestic General PublicGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Water BalanceDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionAgriculture and rural land managementQuantitative Water BalanceDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionAgriculture and rural land managementQuantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0001020
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0001000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0100000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0102020

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
Overall Water BodyPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
QuantitativeGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Status elementGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood2015
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood2015
Quantitative Water BalanceGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical (GW)Poor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical Status elementPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2015
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Chemical GWDTEs testGood2015
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood2015
General Chemical TestPoor2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Ely Ouse and Cut-off channel NVZS390Nitrates Directive
Norfolk Valley FensUK0012892Special Area of ConservationNatural England
Anglian ChalkG71Nitrates Directive
The Wash & North Norfolk CoastUK0017075Special Area of ConservationNatural England
The WashUK9008021Special Protection AreaNatural England
The WashUK11072Ramsar SiteNatural England
Sandringham Sands NorthG718Nitrates Directive
Sandringham Sands SouthG150Nitrates Directive
Nar upstream of Abbey Farm NVZS389Nitrates Directive
Wendling Beck NVZS398Nitrates Directive
Babingley River NVZS383Nitrates Directive
Heacham River NVZS393Nitrates Directive
Mintlyn Stream NVZS384Nitrates Directive
Greater WashUK9020329Special Protection AreaNatural England
Relief Channel/Polver drain NVZS834Nitrates Directive
Blackwater (Wendling Beck) NVZS822Nitrates Directive
Gaywood River NVZS385Nitrates Directive
Ingol NVZS392Nitrates Directive
Country Drain NVZS388Nitrates Directive
Wensum (to Tatterford) NVZS823Nitrates Directive
North West Norfolk ChalkUKGB40501G400200Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies