Ouse Upper and Bedford Management Catchment
About
The River Great Ouse dominates the catchment, from its source near Brackley, flowing north east to Earith. Other main tributaries include the Padbury and Clayden Brooks, rivers Tove, Ouzel, Flit, Ivel, Kym and the Alconbury Brook. The Grand Union Canal crosses through the catchment and is a key inland waterway link from London to the Midlands. Major urban areas are Brackley, Milton Keynes, Leighton Buzzard, Bedford, St Neots, Huntingdon and the North Hertfordshire towns of Hitchin, Letchworth and Baldock. The catchment has significant development. Rivers are generally slow flowing, apart from the chalk stream tributaries of the River Ivel. Land is largely used for agriculture, particularly horticulture, arable and livestock farming. With extensive sand, gravel and clay deposits, the catchment continues to be important for surface quarrying industries. Redundant pits have been used for waste disposal or as lakes for water sports, fisheries and nature reserves. The catchment supports a range of water-based services and activities. Water from rivers and underground water (the Chalk, Woburn Sands and Great Oolite aquifers) is abstracted for public water supply, agricultural, horticultural and industrial use. Water is taken from the River Ouse at Offord to supply Grafham Water reservoir.
Classifications data for Ouse Upper and Bedford Management Catchment
Number of water bodies
The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.
Water body categories | Natural | Artificial | Heavily modified | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
River, canals and surface water transfers | 9 | 0 | 79 | 88 |
Lake | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Coastal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Estuarine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 9 | 4 | 80 | 93 |
Ecological status for surface waters
Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.
Ecological status or potential | Bad | Poor | Moderate | Good | High | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 1 | 4 | 77 | 11 | 0 | 93 |
Number of water body elements | 17 | 61 | 73 | 137 | 497 | 785 |
Chemical status for surface waters
Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.
Chemical status | Fail | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 93 | 0 | 93 |
Number of water body elements | 146 | 1092 | 1238 |
Quantitative status for groundwater
Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.
Quantitative status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of water body elements | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chemical status for groundwater
Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.
Chemical status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of water body elements | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Challenges data for Ouse Upper and Bedford Management Catchment
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Physical modifications | Pollution from abandoned mines | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Pollution from waste water |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 88 |
Total | 3 | 4 | 85 | 0 | 94 | 19 | 95 |
Objectives data for Ouse Upper and Bedford Management Catchment
Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies
Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.
Status | Bad | Poor | Moderate | Good | High | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By 2015 | 0 | 1 | 41 | 12 | 0 | 54 |
By 2021 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
By 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
By 2060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 43 | 49 | 0 | 93 |
Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Fail | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
By 2063 | 0 | 93 | 93 |
Total | 0 | 93 | 93 |
Quantitative status objectives for groundwater
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chemical status objectives for groundwater
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |