Witham - headwaters to conf Cringle Bk Water Body

Poor ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB105030051570
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRSK9266523436
  • Catchment area6315.47 ha
  • Length21.363 km
  • Catchment area63.155 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalPoorPoor
Biological quality elementsPoorPoor
FishPoorPoor
InvertebratesHighHigh
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedPoorPoor
Macrophytes Sub ElementPoorPoor
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
Acid Neutralising CapacityHighHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)GoodHigh
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)HighHigh
Dissolved oxygenPoorGood
PhosphatePoorPoor
TemperatureHighHigh
pHHighHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports goodSupports good
Hydrological RegimeSupports goodSupports good
MorphologySupports goodSupports good
Specific pollutantsHighHigh
IronHighHigh
ManganeseHighHigh
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RFDHigh to Good deterioration, no action required (RFD only)Not applicableNo sector responsibleAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RFDNaturalNatural conditions - otherNo sector responsibleDissolved oxygenDetails
RFDPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuitySector under investigationFishDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryPhosphateDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhosphateDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)OtherFishDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000040
Industry0020000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0200000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other1000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation1000000
Total2220040

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2033Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time
Biological quality elementsGood2033Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time
FishGood2033Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Acid Neutralising CapacityGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Lower Witham NVZS375Nitrates Directive
Lincolnshire LimestoneG69Nitrates Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
55417 554172011, 2010, 20092015, 2013, 2016, 2014, 20192022, 2019
55418 554182010, 2009
UPPER WITHAM @ HIGH ST FB, COLSTERWORTH RSN17982022
R.WITHAM NORTH WITHAM BRIDGE WITH142022
WITHAM CATCHMENT/WITHAM SALTERSFORD (UPPER) SUBCATCHMENT/NORTH WITHAM/ 58932014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 20092016, 2014, 2015, 2013
LINCOLNSHIRE SPECIALS/NORTH WITHAM U/S SITE POLLUTION APRIL 2012/ 425212013
WITHAM CATCHMENT/WITHAM SALTERSFORD (UPPER) SUBCATCHMENT/EASTON PARK/ 58632014, 2012, 2013, 2009, 20112016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019, 2022
TRIB.R.WITHAM PAS EFFLUENT STR. PASE12013, 2012, 2011, 2014, 2010, 20092013, 2019, 20142022, 2019
97461 974612015, 2014, 2016
R.WITHAM EASTON BRIDGE WITH32013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 20152022
R.WITHAM EASTON HALL WITH22013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 2015, 20192022, 2019
LINCOLNSHIRE SPECIALS/COLSTERWORTH A/ 80662013, 2009

Upstream water bodies