Little Ouse (Thelnetham to Hopton Common) Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB105033043110
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
  • NGRTM0030679899
  • Catchment area6.378 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Length4.764 km
  • Catchment area637.824 ha

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalPoorModerate
Biological quality elementsPoorPoor
FishPoorPoor
InvertebratesModerateModerate
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedPoor
Macrophytes Sub ElementPoorPoor
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)ModerateModerate
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)High
Dissolved oxygenBadBad
PhosphateGoodGood
TemperatureHighHigh
pHHighHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports goodSupports good
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support goodSupports good
Supporting elements (Surface Water)ModerateModerate
Mitigation Measures AssessmentModerate or lessModerate or less
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)22014PoorVery certain there is a problem
Dissolved oxygen22014BadVery certain there is a problem
Hydrological Regime22015Does Not Support GoodCertain there is not a problem

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGPhysical modificationLand drainageAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGFlowSurface water abstractionAgriculture and rural land managementDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryFishDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionAgriculture and rural land managementDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPoint sourceGroundwaterIndustryFishDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryInvertebratesDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)OtherInvertebratesDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - water level managementSector under investigationMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageIndustryAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - other operational managementLocal and Central GovernmentMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageIndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationLand drainageAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Local and Central GovernmentMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityLocal and Central GovernmentFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageIndustryDissolved oxygenDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management2001000
Industry0170000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0001000
Local & central government3000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other1000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation1000000
Total7172000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2060Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
InvertebratesGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedNot assessed2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2060Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2060Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Dissolved oxygenGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
PhosphateGood2015
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2027 - Low confidenceTechnically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Specific pollutantsNot assessed2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Ely Ouse and Cut-off channel NVZS390Nitrates Directive
Anglian ChalkG71Nitrates Directive
Waveney & Little Ouse Valley FensUK0012882Special Area of ConservationNatural England

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
LT.OUSE R. BLO NORTON FORD 42M042012, 2013, 2009, 20142015, 2013, 2019, 2016, 20142022, 2019
160653 16065320142016, 2015, 2014
LOWER OUSE/LT OUSE/U/S LT OUSE/BLO NORTON BRIDGE/ 329712012, 2010, 2013, 2011, 20142015, 2013, 2014
LOWER OUSE/LT OUSE/U/S LT OUSE/HOPTON BRIDGE/ 329702012, 2010, 2013, 2011
55908 559082009, 2013, 2011, 20122013, 2016, 2019, 20152019