Mimram (Whitwell to Codicote Bottom) Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB106038033460
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRTL1882821079
  • Catchment area4876.991 ha
  • Length6.413 km
  • Catchment area48.77 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalModerateModerate
Biological quality elementsModerateModerate
FishGoodGood
InvertebratesHighHigh
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedModerateModerate
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerateModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)HighHigh
Dissolved oxygenHighHigh
PhosphatePoorPoor
TemperatureHighHigh
pHHighHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports goodSupports good
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support goodDoes not support good
MorphologySupports goodSupports good
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceRiparian/in-river activities (inc bankside erosion)Agriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGInvasive non-native speciesOther riparian plantsNo sector responsibleMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryHydrological RegimeDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationReservoir / Impoundment - non flow relatedUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationReservoir / Impoundment - non flow relatedOtherFishDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPhosphateDetails
RNAGSuspect dataNot applicableNo sector responsiblePhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTrack/rural roadAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhosphateDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0101000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000100
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0101100

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2015
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceTechnically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2027 - Low confidenceTechnically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsNot assessed2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
LEE NVZS443Nitrates Directive
Luton ChalkG146Nitrates Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
33731 337312013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 2009
LEE/MIMRAM/ROSE FARM/ 211812012, 2010, 20112016, 2019, 20152019
33389 333892013, 2011, 2014, 20122013, 2016, 2014, 2015, 20192022, 2019
LEE/MIMRAM/RYE END COTTAGES/ 211832012, 2010, 2013, 2009, 2011
MIMRAM AT PANSHANGER PLER00912010, 2009
MIMRAM AT HERTINGFORDBURY PLER00902009
34111 341112013, 2011, 2014, 201220192022, 2019
LEE/MIMRAM/DUCK TRAP WOOD/ 186342014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 2009, 20112016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019
MIMRAM AT CODICOTE BOTTOM PLER00892012, 2013, 2010, 2011, 2014, 20092015, 2016, 2019, 2013, 20142019, 2022

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies