Little Ouse (US Thelnetham) Water Body
Bad ecological status
Get Little Ouse (US Thelnetham) data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB105033043060
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
- NGRTM0470276510
- Catchment area3955.02 ha
- Length8.747 km
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Catchment area39.55 km2
Classifications
| Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological | Bad | Bad |
| Biological quality elements | Bad | Bad |
| Fish | Bad | Bad |
| Invertebrates | High | High |
| Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Moderate | Moderate |
| Macrophytes Sub Element | Moderate | Moderate |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate | Moderate |
| Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High | High |
| Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) | High | |
| Dissolved oxygen | Moderate | Good |
| Phosphate | Moderate | Moderate |
| Temperature | High | High |
| pH | High | High |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
| Hydrological Regime | Does not support good | Does not support good |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Moderate | Moderate |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Moderate or less | Moderate or less |
| Specific pollutants | High | High |
| Iron | High | High |
| Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
| Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
| Priority substances | Good | Does not require assessment |
| Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | |
| Fluoranthene | Good | |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
| Classification Element | Cycle | Year | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | 2 | 2014 | Poor | Certain there is not a problem |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
| Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Surface water abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Dissolved oxygen | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Dissolved oxygen | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Dissolved oxygen | Details |
| RNAG | Suspect data | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Land drainage | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Groundwater | Industry | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Hydrological Regime | Details |
| RFD | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Phosphate | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Hydrological Regime | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (continuous) | Water Industry | Phosphate | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Land drainage | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Groundwater abstraction | Water Industry | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Land drainage | Agriculture and rural land management | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Surface water abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Hydrological Regime | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Land drainage | Agriculture and rural land management | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Flow | Surface water abstraction | Agriculture and rural land management | Invertebrates | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
| Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and rural land management | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Industry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Water Industry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Objectives
| Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
| Biological quality elements | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Fish | Good | 2015 | |
| Invertebrates | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Not assessed | 2015 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
| Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown |
| Phosphate | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
| pH | Good | 2015 | |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2015 | |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2015 | |
| Specific pollutants | High | 2015 | |
| Iron | High | 2015 | |
| Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
| Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
| Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
| PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ely Ouse and Cut-off channel NVZ | S390 | Nitrates Directive | |
| Waveney & Little Ouse Valley Fens | UK0012882 | Special Area of Conservation | Natural England |
| Redgrave & South Lopham Fens | UK11056 | Ramsar Site | Natural England |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.