Test - conf Dun to Tadburn Lake Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB107042016460
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
  • NGRSU3404424326
  • Catchment area1904.537 ha
  • Length8.439 km
  • Catchment area19.045 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalModerateModerate
Biological quality elementsPoorPoor
FishPoorPoor
InvertebratesHighHigh
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerateModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsGoodHigh
Acid Neutralising CapacityHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)HighHigh
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)High
Dissolved oxygenHighHigh
PhosphateHighHigh
TemperatureGoodHigh
pHHighHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports goodSupports good
Hydrological RegimeSupports goodSupports good
Supporting elements (Surface Water)ModerateModerate
Mitigation Measures AssessmentModerate or lessModerate or less
Specific pollutantsHighHigh
CopperHighHigh
IronHighHigh
ManganeseHighHigh
PhenolHighHigh
ZincHighHigh
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Lead and Its CompoundsGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
Fish22013PoorCertain there is not a problem
Fish22013PoorCertain there is not a problem
Fish22013PoorCertain there is not a problem
Lead and Its Compounds22013FailUncertain there is a problem

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Local and Central GovernmentMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - structuresUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - water level managementLocal and Central GovernmentFishDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport1000000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government2000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total3000000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedNot assessed2015
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2015
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
PhenolHigh2015
ZincHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Lead and Its CompoundsGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Hamble Estuary Eutrophic NVZ (TraC)ET3Nitrates Directive
Hampshire ChalkG143Nitrates Directive
River TestSWSGZ4011Safeguard Zone
River TestUKENRI13Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
TEST/FISH LAKE/ 70252014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 2009, 20112016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019
TEST/TIMSBURY CARRIER RESTORATION SITE/ 400742012, 2013
TEST/SADDLERS MILL/ 134462010, 2009
R.TEST MIDDLEBRIDGE G00038932013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 2015, 20192022, 2019
TEST/DEAD END/ 128802010, 2009
92700 927002014, 2010, 2013, 20112016, 2015, 2014, 2013
43869 438692011, 2014, 2012, 20102015, 2016, 2014
42045 420452013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 201020192022, 2019
TEST/GREATBRIDGE RAILWAY/ 135652010, 2009
43364 433642009
TEST/TIMSBURY MANOR CARRIER/ 70242009
500M DOWNSTREAM KIMBRIDGE LANE EQSD G00064672016
92701 927012010, 2011
TEST/TIMSBURY MAYFLY CARRIER/ 302692012, 2013, 2011
GREENHILL LEAT ROMSEY G00040372011, 2014, 2012, 2013, 2010, 2009
R TEST GREATBRIDGE G00039002011, 2013, 2012, 2014, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 2015, 20192022, 2019
TEST/LINHAY MEADS/ 132912010, 2009
TEST/MAYS ISLAND/ 135672010, 2009
TEST/TIMSBURY MAYFLY CARRIER U/S OF BRIDGE/ 433612014, 20132016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019
TEST/ROMSEY WAR MEMORIAL PARK/ 113602014, 2012, 2010, 2013, 2009, 20112016, 2019, 2014, 2015, 20132019, 2022
TEST/MEMORIAL PARK MAIN/ 134942010, 2009

Upstream water bodies

Downstream water bodies