Crinnis River Water Body
Moderate ecological status
Get Crinnis River data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB108048001330
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
- NGRSX0596652482
- Catchment area1342.4 ha
- Length6.189 km
- Catchment area13.424 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
Ecological | Poor | Moderate |
Biological quality elements | Poor | Poor |
Fish | Poor | Poor |
Invertebrates | Good | Good |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | Good |
Phytobenthos Sub Element | Good | Good |
Physico-chemical quality elements | High | High |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | High | High |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High | High |
Dissolved oxygen | High | High |
Phosphate | High | High |
Temperature | High | High |
pH | High | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Does not support good | Supports good |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Moderate | Moderate |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Moderate or less | Moderate or less |
Specific pollutants | Moderate | Moderate |
Copper | Moderate | Moderate |
Iron | High | High |
Manganese | High | High |
Zinc | High | High |
Chemical | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail | Does not require assessment |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail | |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail | |
Priority substances | Good | Does not require assessment |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | |
Fluoranthene | Good | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
Classification Element | Cycle | Year | Status | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrological Regime | 2 | 2019 | Does Not Support Good | Certain there is not a problem |
Zinc | 2 | 2019 | High | Quite certain there is a problem |
Zinc | 3 | 2019 | High | Quite certain there is a problem |
Hydrological Regime | 3 | 2019 | Does Not Support Good | Certain there is not a problem |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Urban and transport | Mitigation Measures Assessment | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Local and Central Government | Mitigation Measures Assessment | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Flood protection - other operational management | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Zinc | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Flood protection - structures | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Zinc | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Quarry | Mining and quarrying | Zinc | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Copper | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Copper | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Active mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Copper | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use |
Biological quality elements | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use |
Fish | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use |
Invertebrates | Good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2015 | |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2015 | |
Acid Neutralising Capacity | Good | 2015 | |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2015 | |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Specific pollutants | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Copper | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Iron | High | 2015 | |
Manganese | High | 2015 | |
Zinc | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority substances | Good | 2015 | |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.