Fromus Water Body

Poor ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB105035045980
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRTM3875562658
  • Catchment area3456.79 ha
  • Length13.276 km
  • Catchment area34.568 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalPoor
Biological quality elementsPoor
FishPoor
InvertebratesGood
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood
Macrophytes Sub ElementGood
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate
Acid Neutralising CapacityHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)High
Dissolved oxygenBad
PhosphateModerate
TemperatureHigh
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeSupports good
MorphologySupports good
Specific pollutantsHigh
IronHigh
ManganeseHigh
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsFail
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGood
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityLocal and Central GovernmentFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementInvertebratesDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryInvertebratesDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsibleMercury and Its CompoundsDetails
RNAGPoint sourceTrade/Industry dischargeIndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)OtherFishDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGFlowLow Flow (not drought)No sector responsibleDissolved oxygenDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000010
Industry0010000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport1010000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government1000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other1000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total3020010

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
InvertebratesGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2015
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
Acid Neutralising CapacityGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
PhosphateGood2027Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2040Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Sandlings and ChelmsfordG78Nitrates Directive
Fromus NVZS412Nitrates Directive

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
54843 548432014, 20092014, 2015, 2016
R.ALDE U/S SNAPE SLUICE ALD0402011, 2010, 2009
R.FROMUS THE WATERING SNAPE FRO03020092015, 2016, 20192019
54845 548452011, 2009, 20102019, 2013, 20162019
ALDE & ORE CATCHMENT/RIVER FROMUS/ABBEY FARM B/ 278402013, 2011, 2012, 2010, 2009
149961 14996120142015, 2014
ALDE & ORE CATCHMENT/RIVER FROMUS/SAXMUNDHAM/ 6182013, 2011, 2014, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 2015
ALDE & ORE CATCHMENT/RIVER FROMUS/ABBEY FARM A/ 278392013, 2011, 2012, 2010, 2009
ALDE & ORE CATCHMENT/RIVER FROMUS/SNAPE WATERING/ 6192013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010, 20092013, 2016, 2014, 2015
R.FROMUS GROMFORD FRO0402011, 2010, 2009, 20122015, 2016
R.FROMUS BENHALL GREEN BRIDGE FRO0202010, 2013, 2009, 2011, 20122019, 2015, 20162019

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies