Thames (Leach to Evenlode) Water Body

Poor ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB106039030333
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
  • NGRSP4497808846
  • Catchment area7929.363 ha
  • Length49.788 km
  • Catchment area79.294 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalPoor
Biological quality elementsPoor
FishPoor
InvertebratesHigh
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate
Acid Neutralising CapacityHigh
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)High
Dissolved oxygenHigh
PhosphateModerate
TemperatureModerate
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support good
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Moderate
Mitigation Measures AssessmentModerate or less
Specific pollutantsHigh
ArsenicHigh
CopperHigh
IronHigh
ManganeseHigh
PermethrinHigh
TolueneHigh
TriclosanHigh
ZincHigh
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
HexachlorocyclohexaneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Fail
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Tributyltin CompoundsGood
Trifluralin (Priority hazardous)Good
Priority substancesGood
1,2-dichloroethaneGood
AtrazineGood
BenzeneGood
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Lead and Its CompoundsGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
PentachlorophenolGood
SimazineGood
TrichlorobenzenesGood
TrichloromethaneGood
Other PollutantsGood
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & IsodrinGood
Carbon TetrachlorideGood
DDT TotalGood
TetrachloroethyleneGood
TrichloroethyleneGood
para - para DDTGood

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
Fish22015Poor

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementPhosphateDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Water IndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityOtherFishDetails
RNAGInvasive non-native speciesNorth american signal crayfishNo sector responsibleFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityOtherFishDetails
RNAGFlowSurface water abstractionWater IndustryHydrological RegimeDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)RecreationMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationInland boating and structuresNavigationFishDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPerfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Details
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)NavigationMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhosphateDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000010
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation1000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry1100000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation1000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other1000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total4100010

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available;
Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
Biological quality elementsGood2039Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time
FishGood2039Natural conditions: Ecological recovery time
InvertebratesGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate2015Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Acid Neutralising CapacityGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateModerate2015Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2033Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2033Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Technically infeasible: Practical technical constraints prevent implementation of the measure by an earlier deadline
Specific pollutantsHigh2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
ArsenicHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
PermethrinHigh2015
TolueneHigh2015
TriclosanHigh2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
ZincHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Benzo (b) and (k) fluorantheneGood2015
Benzo (ghi) perelyene and indeno (123-cd) pyreneGood2015
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
HexachlorocyclohexaneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2039Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Tributyltin CompoundsGood2015
Trifluralin (Priority hazardous)Good2015
Priority substancesGood2015
1,2-dichloroethaneGood2015
AtrazineGood2015
BenzeneGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Lead and Its CompoundsGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
PentachlorophenolGood2015
SimazineGood2015
TrichlorobenzenesGood2015
TrichloromethaneGood2015
Other PollutantsGood2015
Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin & IsodrinGood2015
Carbon TetrachlorideGood2015
DDT TotalGood2015
TetrachloroethyleneGood2015
TrichloroethyleneGood2015
para - para DDTGood2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Upper Thames (Leach to Evenlode)SWSGZ4012Safeguard Zone
River ThamesUKENRI17Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
THAMES (LEACH TO EVENLODE) NVZS482Nitrates Directive
Filchhampstead Brook at Farmoor NVZS478Nitrates Directive
Farmoor ReservoirUKENLK168Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
Upper Thames GravelsG84Nitrates Directive
Wadley Stream (Source to Thames at Duxford) NVZS470Nitrates Directive
Thames (Leach to Evenlode)UKGB106039030333Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
THAMES/UPPER THAMES/GREAT BROOK/FLIGHT POND/ 266042013, 2011, 2012
35844 358442010, 2009, 2011
35330 353302010, 2009, 2011
35219 352192012, 2010, 2011
FARINGDON BROOK AT A4095, GREAT FARINGDO PUTR022820092015, 2016
THAMES/UPPER THAMES/ST JOHN'S LOCK CUT/ 4812820142019, 2015, 2016, 20142019
184225 18422520192019
THAMES/UPPER THAMES/EYNSHAM WEIR STREAM/ 190772013, 2011, 2012
THAMES/UPPER THAMES/DUXFORD LOOP/DUXFORD FORD/ 167882011, 20142019, 2015, 2016, 20142019
164599 1645992016, 2015
EYNSHAM WHARF STREAM AT B4044 PTHR02152009
THAMES/UPPER THAMES/SHIFFORD LOCK CUT/ 4812920142019, 2015, 2016, 20142019
THAMES AT WATER INTAKE, FARMOOR PTHR01132009, 2010, 2012, 2011, 2014, 20132015, 2016, 2014, 2019, 20132019
THAMES AT NEWBRIDGE PUTR00992014, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2010, 2011
THAMES AT WATER INTAKE, BUSCOT PUTR01072014, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2010, 20112015, 2014, 2013, 2016
35847 358472014, 2010, 2009, 20112016, 2014, 2015

Downstream water bodies