Berkshire Downs Chalk Operational Catchment
About
The Berkshire Downs Chalk Groundwater Body (GWB) describes part of the Chalk Group and Upper Greensand geological strata that lie beneath the Berkshire Downs. The Berkshire Downs Chalk GWB is located on the western part of the London Basin syncline. The Berkshire Downs Chalk GWB coincides with the entire River Kennet Catchment and part of the Pang Catchment. The River Kennet is located in the western part of the London basin; hence tributaries of the River Kennet flow from springs that emanate from the northern and southern dip slopes of the London Basin. A similar scenario applies to the River Pang. The Chalk and Upper Greensand Aquifers are water-bearing permeable strata that provide a high level of storage. Since they support regionally important groundwater supplies these aquifers are classified as Principal Aquifers. The Chalk is exposed at the surface for a large part of the Berkshire Downs Chalk GWB and in these areas the Chalk is susceptible to vertical migration of chemicals, including fertilisers. In the south eastern areas of the GWB the Chalk it is confined and protected by the London Clay, Lambeth Group, the Bracklesham Group or in places by clay-with-flints drift geology, which directly overlies the Chalk. Where the Chalk is confined it is generally protected from vertical migration of chemicals used at the surface.
![No image available](/catchment-planning/photos/operationalcatchment/1012.jpg)
Classifications data for Berkshire Downs Chalk Operational Catchment
Number of water bodies
The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.
Water body categories | Natural | Artificial | Heavily modified | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
River, canals and surface water transfers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Coastal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Estuarine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Groundwater | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ecological status for surface waters
Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.
Ecological status or potential | Bad | Poor | Moderate | Good | High | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of water body elements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chemical status for surface waters
Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.
Chemical status | Fail | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of water body elements | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quantitative status for groundwater
Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.
Quantitative status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Number of water body elements | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Chemical status for groundwater
Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.
Chemical status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Number of water bodies | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Number of water body elements | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Challenges data for Berkshire Downs Chalk Operational Catchment
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Physical modifications | Pollution from abandoned mines | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Pollution from waste water |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Objectives data for Berkshire Downs Chalk Operational Catchment
Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies
Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.
Status | Bad | Poor | Moderate | Good | High | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Fail | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quantitative status objectives for groundwater
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
By 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Chemical status objectives for groundwater
Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines
Status | Poor | Good | Total |
---|---|---|---|
By 2027 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 1 |