King Georges Reservoir Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB30641523
  • Water Body TypeLake
  • Hydromorphological designationartificial
  • NGRTQ3714796506
  • Mean depth8.122 m
  • Surface area1.629 km2
  • Altitude21 m
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Surface area162.859 ha
  • Catchment area37 ha

Classifications

Classification Item20192022
EcologicalModerateModerate
Biological quality elementsModerateModerate
PhytoplanktonModerateModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerateModerate
SalinityHighHigh
Total NitrogenBadBad
Total PhosphorusPoorBad
Supporting elements (Surface Water)GoodGood
Expert JudgementGoodGood
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGoodGood
Specific pollutantsHighHigh
CopperHighHigh
PermethrinHighHigh
ChemicalFailDoes not require assessment
Priority hazardous substancesFailDoes not require assessment
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
NonylphenolGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Fail
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGoodDoes not require assessment
FluorantheneGood
OctylphenolGood
TrichloromethaneGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessmentDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (intermittent)Water IndustryTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryTotal PhosphorusDetails
RNAGPoint sourceSewage discharge (continuous)Water IndustryPhytoplanktonDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPerfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Details

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0010000
Water Industry0300000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0310000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalPoor2015Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Biological quality elementsPoor2015Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
PhytoplanktonPoor2015Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate2015Technically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
SalinityGood2015
Total NitrogenGood2027 - Low confidenceTechnically infeasible: Cause of adverse impact unknown
Total PhosphorusPoor2021Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsNot assessed2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2015
Expert JudgementGood2015
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
PermethrinHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
NonylphenolGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2039Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
FluorantheneGood2015
OctylphenolGood2015
TrichloromethaneGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
LEE NVZS443Nitrates Directive
LeeSWSGZ4006Safeguard Zone
King George VI ReservoirUKENLK169Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
King Georges ReservoirUKGB30641523Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
KING GEORGE SOUTH OUTLET WSTR03012012, 2009, 2014, 20132019, 2015, 2016, 2014, 20132019, 2022

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies