Berkshire Downs Chalk Water Body

Poor overall status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB40601G600900
  • Water Body TypeGroundwater Body
  • Hydromorphological designationnot applicable
  • NGRSU2766370485
  • Surface area990.256 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Groundwater area99025.554 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
Overall Water BodyPoor
QuantitativePoor
Quantitative Status elementPoor
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusPoor
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood
Quantitative Water BalanceGood
Chemical (GW)Poor
Chemical Status elementPoor
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaPoor
Chemical GWDTEs testGood
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood
General Chemical TestPoor
Supporting elements (Groundwater)
Prevent and Limit ObjectiveActive
Trend AssessmentUpward trend

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGPoint sourcePrivate Sewage TreatmentDomestic General PublicTrend AssessmentDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Water BalanceDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementTrend AssessmentDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryQuantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000010
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0000010

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
Overall Water BodyGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
QuantitativeGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Quantitative Status elementGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood2015
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood2015
Quantitative Water BalanceGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical (GW)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical Status elementGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2015
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical GWDTEs testGood2015
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood2015
General Chemical TestGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
South WessexG151Nitrates Directive
Hamble Estuary Eutrophic NVZ (TraC)ET3Nitrates Directive
Kingsclere and GreywellG145Nitrates Directive
Hampshire ChalkG143Nitrates Directive
Cholsey Brook and tributaries NVZS467Nitrates Directive
Kennet & Lambourn FloodplainUK0030044Special Area of ConservationNatural England
Sulham Brook NVZS462Nitrates Directive
SheeplandsG88Nitrates Directive
Foudry Brook (West End Brook to M4) NVZS459Nitrates Directive
Clayhill Brook NVZS833Nitrates Directive
Berkshire DownsG87Nitrates Directive
Thames (Churn to Coln) NVZS457Nitrates Directive
Thames Wallingford to Caversham NVZS481Nitrates Directive
Ock and tributaries (Land Brook confluence to Thames) NVZS681Nitrates Directive
LECKHAMPSTEADGWSGZ0191Safeguard Zone
Ginge Brook and Mill Brook NVZS469Nitrates Directive
Tuckmill Brook and tributaries NVZS456Nitrates Directive
ASHDOWN PARK WTW - Fognam Down & Ashdown Park sourcesGWSGZ0182Safeguard Zone
Brinkworth Bk- Hancocks Wtr to conf R Avon (Brist) NVZS575Nitrates Directive
Mill Brook and Bradfords Brook system, Wallingford NVZS682Nitrates Directive
River LambournUK0030257Special Area of ConservationNatural England
AXFORDGWSGZ0183Safeguard Zone
BRADFIELD WINDMILL PSGWSGZ0186Safeguard Zone
Kennet Valley AlderwoodsUK0030175Special Area of ConservationNatural England
OgbourneGWSGZ0194Safeguard Zone
ClatfordGWSGZ0401Safeguard Zone
MALRBOROUGHGWSGZ0193Safeguard Zone
HUNGERFORDGWSGZ0190Safeguard Zone
Berkshire Downs ChalkUKGB40601G600900Drinking Water Protected Area

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies