Chipping Norton Jurassic Water Body Poor overall status
Get Chipping Norton Jurassic data Attributes Water Body ID GB40602G600300 Water Body Type Groundwater Body Hydromorphological designation not applicable NGR SP2141024206 Groundwater area 31472.392 ha Surface area 314.724 km2 Surveillance Water Body No Classifications Classification Item 2019 Overall Water Body Poor Quantitative Good Quantitative Status element Good Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body Status Good Quantitative GWDTEs test Good Quantitative Saline Intrusion Good Quantitative Water Balance Good Chemical (GW) Poor Chemical Status element Poor Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body Status Good Chemical Drinking Water Protected Area Poor Chemical GWDTEs test Good Chemical Saline Intrusion Good General Chemical Test Poor Supporting elements (Groundwater) Prevent and Limit Objective Active Trend Assessment Upward trend
Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?
Investigations into classification status No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD) All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in
this water body.
Reason Type SWMI Activity Category Classification Element More information RNAG Diffuse source Poor nutrient management Agriculture and rural land management General Chemical Test Details
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors
identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are
individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a
confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest
classification is less than good status. There may be more than one
reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for
deterioration.
Significant water management issue Physical modifications Pollution from waste water Pollution from towns, cities and transport Changes to the natural flow and level of water Invasive non-native species Pollution from rural areas Pollution from abandoned mines Agriculture and rural land management 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mining and quarrying 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban and transport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local & central government 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic general public 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waste treatment and disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No sector responsible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector under investigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Objectives Classification Item Status Year Reasons Overall Water Body Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Quantitative Good 2015 Quantitative Status element Good 2015 Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body Status Good 2015 Quantitative GWDTEs test Good 2015 Quantitative Saline Intrusion Good 2015 Quantitative Water Balance Good 2015 Chemical (GW) Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Chemical Status element Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body Status Good 2015 Chemical Drinking Water Protected Area Good 2015 Chemical GWDTEs test Good 2015 Chemical Saline Intrusion Good 2015 General Chemical Test Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Protected areas PA Name Id Directive More information Cherwell (Ray to Thames) and Woodeaton Brook NVZ S472 Nitrates Directive River Avon (to confluence with River Severn) NVZ S590 Nitrates Directive Cotswold Jurassic G83 Nitrates Directive Evenlode (Bledington to Glyme confluence) NVZ S475 Nitrates Directive Windrush and tributaries (Little Rissington to Thames) NVZ S483 Nitrates Directive Glyme (Dorn confluence to Evenlode) NVZ S474 Nitrates Directive Leach (Source to Thames) NVZ S476 Nitrates Directive Chipping Norton Jurassic UKGB40602G600300 Drinking Water Protected Area
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within
each cycle.
Monitoring Site Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3