Kent and Leven Management Catchment

About

The Kent Leven catchment is characterised by short rivers rising in the southern and central Lake District fells and flowing southwards into Morecambe Bay. It has several iconic lakes including Englands largest Windermere along with culturally significant waters such as Grasmere and Rydal Water, famed for their shared history with Wordsworth amongst others. The catchment boasts the largest continuous intertidal area in the UK with several high value shellfish beds. Two thirds of the catchment is within the Lake District National Park and there are many designated conservation areas, such as Leighton Moss SSSI nationally renowned for its wader bird populations, all reflecting the high environmental, landscape and amenity value of this area. The rivers and lakes support a diverse range of fish including Sea trout, Atlantic salmon, the rare and under threat Arctic charr and freshwater mussel as well as healthy populations of native White-clawed crayfish. The main urban centres can be found at Windermere/Bowness on Windermere, Kendal and Ulverston. Land use is dominated by livestock agriculture with sheep/beef farming throughout the catchment, and small to medium sized dairy farms lower down the catchment. There is also a significant tourist industry centred round Windermere and the Lakeland fells. A long history of water dependent industries continues today, with several successful paper mills and more recently a rejuvenation of the hydro-electric power sites. There is also a legacy of historic mining activities particularly in the Coniston sub-catchment. All this contributes to what is a truly vibrant rural economy.

River Kent Estuary at Arnside

Classifications data for Kent and Leven Management Catchment

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers330538
Lake101920
Coastal0000
Estuarine0000
Groundwater0000
Total4311458

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies112827057
Number of water body elements444584404541

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies57057
Number of water body elements125809934

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies000
Number of water body elements000

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies000
Number of water body elements000

Challenges data for Kent and Leven Management Catchment

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management00301500
Domestic general public0000020
Industry1000000
Local & central government0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Other0010000
Recreation0000000
Sector under investigation0040000
Urban and transport0000002
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Water Industry00300019
Total1011015221

Objectives data for Kent and Leven Management Catchment

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 201500128029
By 2021000202
By 202700026026
Total00156057

26 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 206305757
Total05757

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
Total000

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
Total000

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Summary Statistics data for Kent and Leven Management Catchment

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential58%26%47%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status94%88%92%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better97%95%97%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or betterGreater than 99%100%Greater than 99%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status85%89%87%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBT100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%95%98%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%100%