Northumbria River Basin District

About

The Northumbria river basin district covers an area of 9,000km2 , extending from the Scottish border in the north through Northumbria to Stockton-upon-Tees in the south. It includes parts of Cumbria to the west and extends to North Sea to the east. The district includes Holy Island and the Farne Islands. Approximately 2.5 million people live in the region, mainly in the areas of Tyne and Wear and the Tees Valley. The major urban centres of the district are Newcastle and Gateshead, Sunderland and Middlesbrough. The Northumbria river basin district has a particularly rich diversity of wildlife and habitats, supporting many species of global and national importance. The management catchments that make up the river basin district include many interconnected rivers, lakes, groundwater, estuaries and coastal waters. These range from industrial urban areas in the east to the moors, hills and valleys of the Pennines in the west. Around 67% of the river basin district is farmed or used for forestry, with a mixture of arable and livestock production including sheep, and on higher ground moorland, management for grouse and forestry. The main industries are chemical, petrochemicals, food, drink, transport equipment and metal sectors. Although agriculture only makes up a small part of the regional economy it is critical element of the rural economy.

Photograph of bridges over the River Tyne in Newcastle

Classifications data for Northumbria River Basin District

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers221292315
Lake9102645
Coastal5117
Estuarine1067
Groundwater100010
Total24613125384

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies1162202972374
Number of water body elements2213527533227213485

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies3740374
Number of water body elements85347875640

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies1910
Number of water body elements23840

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies7310
Number of water body elements104050

Challenges data for Northumbria River Basin District

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management1039015200
Domestic general public0020074
Industry0080071
Local & central government10510011
Mining and quarrying001112000
Navigation00160000
No sector responsible0900000
Other00120015
Recreation0080010
Sector under investigation10320000
Urban and transport005800130
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Water Industry130800084140
Total169307112152114151

Objectives data for Northumbria River Basin District

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 20150611970114
By 202101321025
By 20270012340235
Total07153520374

234 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 20630374374
Total0374374

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 2015099
By 2040011
Total01010

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 2015538
By 2027011
By 2040011
Total5510

1 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Protected Areas data for Northumbria River Basin District

Drinking water protected areas current status and at risk

Water body typeNumber of drinking water protected areasNumber ‘at risk’Number at poor chemical status for drinking water protected area objectives
Surface water295Does not apply to surface waters
Groundwater1031

Shellfish water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of shellfish watersObjectiveNumber currently achieving standardNumber not sampled due to lack of commercial activity
1Endeavour to observe the Shellfish Directions standard of ≤300 E.coli/100ml shellfish flesh and intravalvular liquid10

Bathing water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of bathing watersObjectiveNumber which met at least the sufficient classification in 2021Number expected to achieve at least sufficient in 2022Number at risk of not achieving sufficient in 2022
33At least sufficient classification32321

There are 0 unassessed bathing waters

Nutrient sensitive areas (nitrate vulnerable zones)

Reason for designationNumber of NVZsLand area (ha) covered by NVZ type% of river basin district covered by NVZ type
High nitrates in surface waters1582,1309
High nitrates in groundwater519,6722
Eutrophication in estuaries and coastal waters112,6541

Nutrient sensitive areas (Urban Waste Water Treatment Regulations)

Reason for designationNumber of Sensitive areasLength (KM)/Area (km2) designated
Eutrophication in rivers4117
Eutrophication in estuaries or coastal waters12.68

Habitats site (European site) protected areas*

Site typeNumber of sites
Ramsar Site5
Special Area of Conservation11
Special Protection Area9

Condition of underlying water-dependent Site of Special Scientific Interest units**

RBMP water-dependent conditionUnit area (ha)% of total unit area
RBMP-Favourable (Compliant)17,08031.2
RBMP-Unfavourable - Recovering34,49963.0
RBMP-Unfavourable - No change7601.4
RBMP-Unfavourable - Declining2,3854.4
RBMP-Partially destroyed00.0
RBMP-Destroyed00.0
RBMP-Not Recorded00.0

Download European Sites target data

*Ramsar sites are not protected areas under the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2017. However they are treated in line with Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA) as a matter of Government policy. Most Ramsar sites coincide with SACs and/or SPAs, but a small number are designated as Ramsar sites only. These are included in the water-dependent site condition data.

**Includes SSSI units underlying European sites and Ramsar sites where the habitat is water-dependent. The "RBMP-favourable" category in these tables includes units where any reasons for not being in "favourable condition", as far as can be ascertained, do not relate to the water-dependent features. As a result, all condition categories have the prefix "RBMP" to distinguish these from conventional SSSI condition reporting, in which pressures not relevant to river basin planning are included in determining site condition. Data retrieved 2019. Methodology changes mean this data does not form a continuous series with data reported in 2015.

Summary Statistics data for Northumbria River Basin District

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential27%20%14%71%26%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status87%81%77%96%87%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better94%100%43%100%94%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or betterGreater than 99%100%86%100%99%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%0%0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status85%84%85%87%85%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT90%100%86%100%91%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBT98%100%99%100%98%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%100%100%100%

Groundwater

Summary statisticGround water
% of water bodies at good chemical (GW) status30%
% of groundwater chemical elements at good status80%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical (GW) status50%
% of groundwater chemical elements with an objective of good90%
% of water bodies at good quantitative status90%
% of groundwater quantitative elements at good status95%
% of water bodies with an objective of good quantitative status100%
% of groundwater quantitative elements with an objective of good100%