Severn River Basin District

About

The Severn river basin district, which covers over 21,000km2 lies both in England and Wales. It extends from the Welsh uplands, through the rolling hills of the Midlands and south to the Severn Estuary. In total over 5 million people live and work in the region and, although predominantly rural, it includes urban areas such as Bristol, Coventry, Cardiff, the South Wales Valleys and parts of the West Midlands conurbation. The Severn river basin district has a particularly rich diversity of wildlife and habitats, supporting many species of global and national importance. For example, the Severn Estuary and its surrounding area are protected for their bird populations, habitats and migratory fish species such as Atlantic salmon, shad, lamprey and eel. The management catchments that make up the river basin district range from energetic upland streams to slower rivers in the lowlands, and include sandstone and limestone aquifers used for public water supply in the Midlands. Around 80% of the river basin district land is used for agriculture and forestry, which shapes much of the landscape. The sector includes beef and sheep farming, large-scale dairy farms, coniferous forestry plantations and some arable and specialist horticulture. The economy of the district is supported by business, transport, health, tourism and recreation as well as manufacturing, mineral industries and the operation of commercial ports.

Photograph of the River Severn from Wintour's Leap

Classifications data for Severn River Basin District

Number of water bodies

The number of water bodies in the river basin district. It shows whether these are natural, artificial (such as canals and reservoirs) or have been modified ('heavily modified') for particular uses.

Water body categoriesNaturalArtificialHeavily modifiedTotal
River, canals and surface water transfers3583651445
Lake1071027
Coastal0000
Estuarine0033
Groundwater330033
Total4014364508

Ecological status for surface waters

Table summarises the current ecological status of surface water bodies. Water bodies are classified as being at high, good, moderate, poor or bad ecological status or potential.

Ecological status or potentialBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
Number of water bodies11110309450475
Number of water body elements3933756151827784233

Chemical status for surface waters

Table summarises the current chemical status of water bodies. These are classified as being at good or fail.

Chemical statusFailGoodTotal
Number of water bodies4750475
Number of water body elements115952176376

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Quantitative status for groundwater

Table summarises the quantitative status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Quantitative statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies92433
Number of water body elements14118132

Chemical status for groundwater

Table summarises the chemical status of groundwater water bodies. These are classified as being at good or poor.

Chemical statusPoorGoodTotal
Number of water bodies122133
Number of water body elements21144165

Challenges data for Severn River Basin District

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issueChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPhysical modificationsPollution from abandoned minesPollution from rural areasPollution from towns, cities and transportPollution from waste water
Agriculture and rural land management12048088901
Domestic general public00000415
Industry501200225
Local & central government00460000
Mining and quarrying00116000
Navigation2070000
No sector responsible0500000
Other20312000
Recreation0060000
Sector under investigation40160010
Urban and transport0055001053
Waste treatment and disposal0000011
Water Industry5609003328
Total81523118889173343

Objectives data for Severn River Basin District

Ecological status or potential objectives for surface water bodies

Table summarises the ecological status and ecological potential objectives set for water bodies in the river basin management plan. Each water body is only counted once in this table. Each water body objective consists of a target status and a date when it was, or is expected to be, met.

StatusBadPoorModerateGoodHighTotal
By 20150454490107
By 202100317020
By 202700163280344
By 2033000404
Total04733980475

341 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for surface water bodies

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusFailGoodTotal
By 20630475475
Total0475475

0 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Quantitative status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 201562228
By 2021022
By 2027033
Total62733

3 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Chemical status objectives for groundwater

Including those with less stringent objectives and extended deadlines

StatusPoor
GoodTotal
By 201511718
By 2021033
By 2027099
By 2050033
Total13233

9 of the "by 2027" objectives are low confidence

Protected Areas data for Severn River Basin District

Drinking water protected areas current status and at risk

Water body typeNumber of drinking water protected areasNumber ‘at risk’Number at poor chemical status for drinking water protected area objectives
Surface water2213Does not apply to surface waters
Groundwater33178

Shellfish water protected areas current status and objectives

No data to show

Bathing water protected areas current status and objectives

Number of bathing watersObjectiveNumber which met at least the sufficient classification in 2021Number expected to achieve at least sufficient in 2022Number at risk of not achieving sufficient in 2022
4At least sufficient classification422

There are 0 unassessed bathing waters

Nutrient sensitive areas (nitrate vulnerable zones)

Reason for designationNumber of NVZsLand area (ha) covered by NVZ type% of river basin district covered by NVZ type
High nitrates in surface waters66688,72249
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs1121,7812
High nitrates in groundwater22318,31723

Nutrient sensitive areas (Urban Waste Water Treatment Regulations)

Reason for designationNumber of Sensitive areasLength (KM)/Area (km2) designated
Eutrophication in rivers20816
Eutrophication in canals263.00
High nitrate in surface fresh water230.00
Eutrophication in lakes or reservoirs23.10

Habitats site (European site) protected areas*

Site typeNumber of sites
Ramsar Site4
Special Area of Conservation10
Special Protection Area3

Condition of underlying water-dependent Site of Special Scientific Interest units**

RBMP water-dependent conditionUnit area (ha)% of total unit area
RBMP-Favourable (Compliant)11,57184.2
RBMP-Unfavourable - Recovering1,3229.6
RBMP-Unfavourable - No change4863.5
RBMP-Unfavourable - Declining3672.7
RBMP-Partially destroyed00.0
RBMP-Destroyed20.0
RBMP-Not Recorded00.0

Download European Sites target data

*Ramsar sites are not protected areas under the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations 2017. However they are treated in line with Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA) as a matter of Government policy. Most Ramsar sites coincide with SACs and/or SPAs, but a small number are designated as Ramsar sites only. These are included in the water-dependent site condition data.

**Includes SSSI units underlying European sites and Ramsar sites where the habitat is water-dependent. The "RBMP-favourable" category in these tables includes units where any reasons for not being in "favourable condition", as far as can be ascertained, do not relate to the water-dependent features. As a result, all condition categories have the prefix "RBMP" to distinguish these from conventional SSSI condition reporting, in which pressures not relevant to river basin planning are included in determining site condition. Data retrieved 2019. Methodology changes mean this data does not form a continuous series with data reported in 2015.

Summary Statistics data for Severn River Basin District

Ecological status and potential

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good or better ecological status/potential9%11%0%9%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and specific pollutants at good or better status77%48%91%76%
% of water bodies with an objective of good ecological status/potential or better84%70%100%84%
% of biological elements, phys-chem elements and Specific Pollutants with an objective of good status or better97%92%100%97%

Chemical

Summary statisticRivers, Canals and SWTsLakesEstuariesCoastalSurface Waters Combined
% of water bodies at good chemical status0%0%0%0%
% of chemical elements at good status82%81%87%82%
% of water bodies at good chemical status without uPBT98%100%67%97%
% of chemical elements at good status without uPBTGreater than 99%100%99%Greater than 99%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good100%100%100%100%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical status without uPBT100%100%100%100%
% of chemical elements with an objective of good without uPBTs100%100%100%100%

Groundwater

Summary statisticGround water
% of water bodies at good chemical (GW) status64%
% of groundwater chemical elements at good status87%
% of water bodies with an objective of good chemical (GW) status97%
% of groundwater chemical elements with an objective of goodGreater than 99%
% of water bodies at good quantitative status73%
% of groundwater quantitative elements at good status89%
% of water bodies with an objective of good quantitative status82%
% of groundwater quantitative elements with an objective of good92%