The Gara Water Body Moderate ecological status
Attributes Water Body ID GB108046004930 Water Body Type River Hydromorphological designation not designated artificial or heavily modified NGR SX8206947562 Catchment area 32.272 km2 Catchment area 3227.19 ha Length 15.097 km Surveillance Water Body Yes Classifications Classification Item 2019 Ecological Moderate Biological quality elements Moderate Fish Good Invertebrates High Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Moderate Macrophytes Sub Element Good Phytobenthos Sub Element Moderate Physico-chemical quality elements Good Ammonia (Phys-Chem) High Dissolved oxygen Good Phosphate Good Temperature High pH High Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good Hydrological Regime High Morphology Supports good Chemical Fail Priority hazardous substances Fail Benzo(a)pyrene Good Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good Hexachlorobenzene Good Hexachlorobutadiene Good Mercury and Its Compounds Fail Nonylphenol Good Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Fail Priority substances Good 1,2-dichloroethane Good Benzene Good Cypermethrin (Priority) Good Dichloromethane Good Fluoranthene Good Trichloromethane Good Other Pollutants Good Carbon Tetrachloride Good DDT Total Good para - para DDT Good
Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?
Investigations into classification status No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD) All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in
this water body.
Reason Type SWMI Activity Category Classification Element More information RNAG Diffuse source Poor Livestock Management Agriculture and rural land management Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor soil management Agriculture and rural land management Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor nutrient management Agriculture and rural land management Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Details RNAG Point source Sewage discharge (continuous) Water Industry Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Mercury and Its Compounds Details
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors
identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are
individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a
confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest
classification is less than good status. There may be more than one
reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for
deterioration.
Significant water management issue Physical modifications Pollution from waste water Pollution from towns, cities and transport Changes to the natural flow and level of water Invasive non-native species Pollution from rural areas Pollution from abandoned mines Agriculture and rural land management 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mining and quarrying 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban and transport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Industry 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Local & central government 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic general public 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waste treatment and disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No sector responsible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector under investigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 0 0 0 3 0
Objectives Classification Item Status Year Reasons Ecological Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Biological quality elements Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Fish Good 2015 Invertebrates Good 2015 Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Physico-chemical quality elements Good 2015 Ammonia (Phys-Chem) Good 2015 Dissolved oxygen Good 2015 Phosphate Good 2015 Temperature Good 2015 pH Good 2015 Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good 2015 Hydrological Regime Supports good 2015 Supporting elements (Surface Water) Not assessed 2015 Specific pollutants Not assessed 2015 Chemical Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority hazardous substances Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Benzo(a)pyrene Good 2015 Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good 2015 Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good 2015 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good 2015 Hexachlorobenzene Good 2015 Hexachlorobutadiene Good 2015 Mercury and Its Compounds Good 2040 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Nonylphenol Good 2015 Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good 2015 Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority substances Good 2015 1,2-dichloroethane Good 2015 Benzene Good 2015 Cypermethrin (Priority) Good 2015 Dichloromethane Good 2015 Fluoranthene Good 2015 Trichloromethane Good 2015 Other Pollutants Good 2015 Carbon Tetrachloride Good 2015 DDT Total Good 2015 para - para DDT Good 2015
Protected areas PA Name Id Directive More information Start Bay_E UKSW121 Shellfish Water Directive Slapton Ley Eutrophic lake NVZ EL124 Nitrates Directive
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within
each cycle.
Monitoring Site Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 THE GARA AT TORCROSS 70810102 2015 THE GARA AT HIGHER NORTH MILL 70810144 2010, 2009, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2013 9308 9308 2009, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012, 2010 2019, 2015, 2016, 2014, 2013 2019 THE GARA AT OTTER CLIFF 70810128 2009, 2014, 2012, 2013 2016, 2014, 2015, 2013 THE GARA/HIGHER NORTH MILL -(SP)/ 28956 2010, 2013, 2009, 2011, 2014, 2012 2013, 2016, 2019, 2014, 2015 2019