Red River (Upper) Water Body
Moderate ecological status
Get Red River (Upper) data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB108049000600
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
- NGRSW6163141707
- Catchment area30.49 km2
- Catchment area3049.021 ha
- Length15.762 km
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
Classifications
| Classification Item | 2019 |
|---|---|
| Ecological | Moderate |
| Biological quality elements | Poor |
| Fish | Poor |
| Invertebrates | Poor |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | High |
| Acid Neutralising Capacity | High |
| Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | High |
| Dissolved oxygen | High |
| Phosphate | High |
| Temperature | High |
| pH | High |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good |
| Hydrological Regime | Supports good |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Moderate |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Moderate or less |
| Specific pollutants | Moderate |
| Arsenic | High |
| Copper | Moderate |
| Iron | High |
| Manganese | Moderate |
| Zinc | Moderate |
| Chemical | Fail |
| Priority hazardous substances | Fail |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good |
| Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good |
| Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Good |
| Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good |
| Cadmium and Its Compounds | Fail |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail |
| Priority substances | Fail |
| Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good |
| Fluoranthene | Good |
| Lead and Its Compounds | Good |
| Nickel and Its Compounds | Fail |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment |
Investigations into classification status
No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
| Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Other (not in list, must add details in comments) | Urban and transport | Mitigation Measures Assessment | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Landfill leaching | Waste treatment and disposal | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Zinc | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (intermittent) | Water Industry | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Zinc | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Cadmium and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Zinc | Details |
| RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Invertebrates | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Cadmium and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Copper | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Sewage discharge (intermittent) | Water Industry | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Physical modification | Urbanisation - urban development | Urban and transport | Fish | Details |
| RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Nickel and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Nickel and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Nickel and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Diffuse source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Cadmium and Its Compounds | Details |
| RNAG | Natural | Natural mineralisation | No sector responsible | Copper | Details |
| RNAG | Point source | Abandoned mine | Mining and quarrying | Copper | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
| Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Urban and transport | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Objectives
| Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
| Biological quality elements | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
| Fish | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
| Invertebrates | Poor | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use; Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available |
| Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2015 | |
| Acid Neutralising Capacity | Good | 2015 | |
| Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2015 | |
| Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
| Phosphate | Good | 2015 | |
| Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
| pH | Good | 2015 | |
| Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
| Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Mitigation Measures Assessment | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Specific pollutants | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Arsenic | High | 2015 | |
| Copper | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Iron | High | 2015 | |
| Manganese | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Zinc | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Chemical | Good | 2063 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
| Benzo(b)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
| Benzo(g-h-i)perylene | Good | 2015 | |
| Benzo(k)fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
| Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
| Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
| Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
| Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
| Priority substances | Good | 2033 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
| Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
| Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
| Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2033 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
| Other Pollutants | Does not require assessment | 2015 |
Protected areas
No data to show
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.