Wade Brook Water Body
Poor ecological status
Get Wade Brook data
Attributes
- Water Body IDGB112068060370
- Water Body TypeRiver
- Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
- NGRSJ7476571990
- Catchment area52.804 km2
- Surveillance Water BodyNo
- Length27.545 km
- Catchment area5280.41 ha
Classifications
Classification Item | 2019 |
---|---|
Ecological | Poor |
Biological quality elements | Poor |
Invertebrates | Moderate |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Poor |
Macrophytes Sub Element | Poor |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Moderate |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Bad |
Dissolved oxygen | High |
Phosphate | Moderate |
Temperature | Good |
pH | High |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good |
Morphology | Supports good |
Specific pollutants | Moderate |
2,4-dichlorophenol | High |
Arsenic | High |
Copper | High |
Cyanide | Moderate |
Iron | High |
Manganese | High |
Phenol | Moderate |
Zinc | High |
Chemical | Fail |
Priority hazardous substances | Fail |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Fail |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Fail |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Fail |
Priority substances | Fail |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good |
Fluoranthene | Good |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good |
Trichlorobenzenes | Good |
Trichloromethane | Fail |
Other Pollutants | Good |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good |
Tetrachloroethylene | Good |
Trichloroethylene | Good |
Investigations into classification status
Classification Element | Cycle | Year | Status | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | 2 | 2014 | Poor | Quite certain there is a problem |
Zinc | 2 | 2015 | Moderate | Certain there is not a problem |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | 2 | 2016 | Good | Quite certain there is a problem |
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)
All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.
Reason Type | SWMI | Activity | Category | Classification Element | More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNAG | Point source | Trade/Industry discharge | Industry | Phenol | Details |
RFD | High to Good deterioration, no action required (RFD only) | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Temperature | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Trade/Industry discharge | Industry | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Invasive non-native species | North american signal crayfish | No sector responsible | Invertebrates | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor nutrient management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor Livestock Management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Landfill leaching | Industry | Trichloromethane | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Contaminated land | Industry | Cyanide | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Trade/Industry discharge | Industry | Cyanide | Details |
RNAG | measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Mercury and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | Unknown (pending investigation) | Unknown (pending investigation) | Sector under investigation | Cadmium and Its Compounds | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Farm/site infrastructure | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Farm/site infrastructure | Agriculture and rural land management | Phosphate | Details |
RNAG | Diffuse source | Poor soil management | Agriculture and rural land management | Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Details |
RFD | Monitoring Site Changed (RFD only) | Not applicable | No sector responsible | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
RNAG | Point source | Trade/Industry discharge | Industry | Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Details |
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector
The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.
Significant water management issue | Physical modifications | Pollution from waste water | Pollution from towns, cities and transport | Changes to the natural flow and level of water | Invasive non-native species | Pollution from rural areas | Pollution from abandoned mines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and rural land management | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Industry | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mining and quarrying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban and transport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Water Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Local & central government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic general public | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recreation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste treatment and disposal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No sector responsible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sector under investigation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Objectives
Classification Item | Status | Year | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Ecological | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Biological quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Invertebrates | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Physico-chemical quality elements | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Ammonia (Phys-Chem) | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Dissolved oxygen | Good | 2015 | |
Phosphate | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Temperature | Good | 2015 | |
pH | Good | 2015 | |
Hydromorphological Supporting Elements | Supports good | 2015 | |
Hydrological Regime | Supports good | 2015 | |
Supporting elements (Surface Water) | Not assessed | 2015 | |
Specific pollutants | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
2,4-dichlorophenol | High | 2015 | |
Arsenic | High | 2015 | |
Copper | High | 2015 | |
Cyanide | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Iron | High | 2015 | |
Manganese | High | 2015 | |
Phenol | High | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Zinc | High | 2021 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Chemical | Good | 2063 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority hazardous substances | Good | 2063 | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens; Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Benzo(a)pyrene | Good | 2015 | |
Cadmium and Its Compounds | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide | Good | 2015 | |
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobenzene | Good | 2015 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | Good | 2015 | |
Mercury and Its Compounds | Good | 2040 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) | Good | 2015 | |
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) | Good | 2063 | Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time |
Priority substances | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Cypermethrin (Priority) | Good | 2015 | |
Fluoranthene | Good | 2015 | |
Lead and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Nickel and Its Compounds | Good | 2015 | |
Trichlorobenzenes | Good | 2015 | |
Trichloromethane | Good | 2027 - Low confidence | Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens |
Other Pollutants | Good | 2015 | |
Carbon Tetrachloride | Good | 2015 | |
Tetrachloroethylene | Good | 2015 | |
Trichloroethylene | Good | 2015 |
Protected areas
PA Name | Id | Directive | More information |
---|---|---|---|
River Weaver (Dane to Frodsham) NVZ | S636 | Nitrates Directive |
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body
Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.