North Kent Medway Chalk Water Body

Poor overall status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB40601G500300
  • Water Body TypeGroundwater Body
  • Hydromorphological designationnot applicable
  • NGRTQ6187174992
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Surface area233.666 km2
  • Groundwater area23366.581 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
Overall Water BodyPoor
QuantitativePoor
Quantitative Status elementPoor
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusPoor
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood
Quantitative Water BalancePoor
Chemical (GW)Poor
Chemical Status elementPoor
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaPoor
Chemical GWDTEs testGood
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood
General Chemical TestPoor
Supporting elements (Groundwater)
Prevent and Limit ObjectiveActive
Trend AssessmentUpward trend

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageUrban and transportTrend AssessmentDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceContaminated landIndustryChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementTrend AssessmentDetails
RNAGNaturalNatural conditions - otherNo sector responsibleQuantitative Water BalanceDetails
RNAGNaturalNatural conditions - otherNo sector responsibleQuantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusDetails
RNAGPoint sourceLeaking utility sewersWater IndustryGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceContaminated landIndustryGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor pesticide managementAgriculture and rural land managementGeneral Chemical TestDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementTrend AssessmentDetails
RNAGPoint sourceLeaking utility sewersWater IndustryChemical Drinking Water Protected AreaDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementTrend AssessmentDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000030
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport0000000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total0000030

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
Overall Water BodyGood2050Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
QuantitativeGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Status elementGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Quantitative GWDTEs testGood2015
Quantitative Saline IntrusionGood2015
Quantitative Water BalanceGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Chemical (GW)Good2050Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Chemical Status elementGood2050Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Chemical Dependent Surface Water Body StatusGood2015
Chemical Drinking Water Protected AreaGood2050Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time
Chemical GWDTEs testGood2015
Chemical Saline IntrusionGood2015
General Chemical TestGood2050Natural conditions: Groundwater status recovery time

Protected areas

PA NameIdDirectiveMore information
Bourne NVZS494Nitrates Directive
R. GREAT STOUR NVZS515Nitrates Directive
MaidstoneG64Nitrates Directive
PlaxtolG63Nitrates Directive
Thames Estuary & MarshesUK9012021Special Protection AreaNatural England
Thames Estuary & MarshesUK11069Ramsar SiteNatural England
North KentG65Nitrates Directive
COASTAL STREAMS TO LOWER THAMES NVZS665Nitrates Directive
SOUTHFLEETGWSGZ0126Safeguard Zone
HIGHAMGWSGZ0112Safeguard Zone
DENE FARM CUXTONGWSGZ0103Safeguard Zone
WINDMILL HILLGWSGZ0136Safeguard Zone
CUXTON BOREHOLE RAWGWSGZ0102Safeguard Zone
North Kent Medway ChalkUKGB40601G500300Drinking Water Protected Area
Peters PitUK0030237Special Area of ConservationNatural England
Lane End GroupGWSGZ0337Safeguard Zone
STROODGWSGZ0129Safeguard Zone

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies