Beam and Ravensbourne Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB106037028100
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationheavily modified
  • NGRTQ5127085000
  • Catchment area23.849 km2
  • Catchment area2384.93 ha
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Length8.365 km

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalModerate
Biological quality elementsBad
FishBad
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedModerate
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerate
Phytobenthos Sub ElementModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Moderate
Dissolved oxygenPoor
PhosphatePoor
TemperatureHigh
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeSupports good
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Moderate
Mitigation Measures AssessmentModerate or less
Specific pollutantsHigh
ChlorothalonilHigh
PendimethalinHigh
TriclosanHigh
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Benzo(b)fluorantheneGood
Benzo(g-h-i)peryleneGood
Benzo(k)fluorantheneGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
HexachlorocyclohexaneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
NonylphenolGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Fail
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
QuinoxyfenGood
Priority substancesGood
AclonifenGood
AlachlorGood
BifenoxGood
CybutryneGood
Dichlorvos (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
TerbutrynGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

No data to show

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGPoint sourceLandfill leachingUrban and transportAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationReservoir / Impoundment - non flow relatedLocal and Central GovernmentDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPoint sourceIncidentsUrban and transportAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageUrban and transportAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPoint sourceIncidentsUrban and transportDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceTransport DrainageUrban and transportDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPoint sourceMisconnectionsDomestic General PublicAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Urban and transportMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor nutrient managementAgriculture and rural land managementDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationOther (not in list, must add details in comments)Local and Central GovernmentMitigation Measures AssessmentDetails
RNAGPoint sourceMisconnectionsDomestic General PublicDissolved oxygenDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - structuresUrban and transportMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGUnknown (pending investigation)Unknown (pending investigation)Sector under investigationPerfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Details
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportPhosphateDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportAmmonia (Phys-Chem)Details
RNAGPhysical modificationUrbanisation - urban developmentUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGPoint sourceMisconnectionsDomestic General PublicPhosphateDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationFlood protection - structuresUrban and transportFishDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management0000000
Industry0000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport5030000
Water Industry0000000
Local & central government1000000
Domestic general public0010000
Recreation0000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total6040000

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use
Biological quality elementsModerate2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use
FishModerate2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits;
Good status prevented by A/HMWB designated use: Action to get biological element to good would have significant adverse impact on use
Physico-chemical quality elementsModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Moderate2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
Dissolved oxygenModerate2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens;
Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
PhosphateModerate2015Disproportionately expensive: Unfavourable balance of costs and benefits
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2015
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Mitigation Measures AssessmentGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
ChlorothalonilHigh2015
PendimethalinHigh2015
TriclosanHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time;
Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Benzo(b)fluorantheneGood2015
Benzo(g-h-i)peryleneGood2015
Benzo(k)fluorantheneGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
HexachlorocyclohexaneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
NonylphenolGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2039Technically infeasible: No known technical solution is available
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
QuinoxyfenGood2015
Priority substancesGood2015
AclonifenGood2015
AlachlorGood2015
BifenoxGood2015
CybutryneGood2015
Dichlorvos (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
TerbutrynGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

No data to show

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
33567 3356720092013, 2014
BEAM/BRETONS/ 169892011, 2014, 2010, 20092015, 2016, 2019, 20142019
33885 3388520132013
BEAM/EASTMINSTER SCHOOL/ 169882013, 20112015, 2013, 2016, 20192019
RAVENSBOURNE ( ROM ) AT A125 PRGR010020132013, 2016, 2014, 2019, 20152019
BEAM/FORDS/ 169912011, 2014, 2010, 20092015, 2016
BEAM AT HAVERING SLUICE PRGR00032013, 2012, 2010, 2011, 2014, 20092016, 2013, 2015, 2014, 20192019
90946 909462013, 2012, 20142019, 2014, 2013, 2016, 20152019
BEAM AT A13 BRIDGE PRGR00012014, 20092016, 2014, 2019, 20152019
BEAM/RAVENSBOURNE/HARROW LODGE PARK/ 498032015, 2016, 20192019
BEAM/RAVENSBOURNE/HAYNES PARK/ 369472015, 2016

Downstream water bodies