Claw Water Body Poor ecological status
Attributes Water Body ID GB108047008060 Water Body Type River Hydromorphological designation not designated artificial or heavily modified NGR SX3609799944 Catchment area 3265.87 ha Length 14.659 km Catchment area 32.659 km2 Surveillance Water Body Yes Classifications Classification Item 2019 Ecological Poor Biological quality elements Poor Fish Poor Invertebrates High Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good Macrophytes Sub Element High Phytobenthos Sub Element Good Physico-chemical quality elements Good Ammonia (Phys-Chem) High Dissolved oxygen High Phosphate Good Temperature Good pH High Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good Hydrological Regime High Morphology Supports good Specific pollutants High Zinc High Chemical Fail Priority hazardous substances Fail Benzo(a)pyrene Good Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good Hexachlorobenzene Good Hexachlorobutadiene Good Mercury and Its Compounds Fail Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Fail Priority substances Good Cypermethrin (Priority) Good Fluoranthene Good Other Pollutants Does not require assessment
Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?
Investigations into classification status No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD) All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in
this water body.
Reason Type SWMI Activity Category Classification Element More information RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Mercury and Its Compounds Details RNAG Natural Natural conditions - other No sector responsible Fish Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor soil management Agriculture and rural land management Fish Details RNAG Natural Natural conditions - other No sector responsible Fish Details RNAG Point source Farm/site infrastructure Agriculture and rural land management Fish Details RNAG Diffuse source Riparian/in-river activities (inc bankside erosion) Agriculture and rural land management Fish Details RNAG Diffuse source Poor Livestock Management Agriculture and rural land management Fish Details
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors
identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are
individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a
confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest
classification is less than good status. There may be more than one
reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for
deterioration.
Significant water management issue Physical modifications Pollution from waste water Pollution from towns, cities and transport Changes to the natural flow and level of water Invasive non-native species Pollution from rural areas Pollution from abandoned mines Agriculture and rural land management 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mining and quarrying 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban and transport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local & central government 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic general public 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waste treatment and disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No sector responsible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector under investigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Objectives Classification Item Status Year Reasons Ecological Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Biological quality elements Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Fish Good 2027 - Low confidence Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens Invertebrates Good 2015 Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good 2015 Physico-chemical quality elements Good 2015 Ammonia (Phys-Chem) Good 2015 Dissolved oxygen Good 2015 Phosphate Good 2015 Temperature Good 2015 pH Good 2015 Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good 2015 Hydrological Regime Supports good 2015 Supporting elements (Surface Water) Not assessed 2015 Specific pollutants High 2015 Zinc High 2015 Chemical Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority hazardous substances Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Benzo(a)pyrene Good 2015 Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good 2015 Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good 2015 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good 2015 Hexachlorobenzene Good 2015 Hexachlorobutadiene Good 2015 Mercury and Its Compounds Good 2040 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good 2015 Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority substances Good 2015 Cypermethrin (Priority) Good 2015 Fluoranthene Good 2015 Other Pollutants Does not require assessment 2015
Protected areas PA Name Id Directive More information Lower River Tamar SWSGZ5015 Safeguard Zone
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within
each cycle.
Monitoring Site Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 8959 8959 2012, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2011, 2009 2014, 2016, 2019, 2015, 2013 2019 RIVER CLAW AT TETCOTT BRIDGE 81201106 2010, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2011, 2014 2015, 2019, 2013, 2016, 2014 2019 ANVIL CORNER TIP DOWNSTREAM 81201370 2011, 2012, 2010, 2013 2015, 2016 TAMAR/CLAW/MAIN CLAW/TETCOTT BRIDGE/ 13271 2010, 2009, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012 2019, 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014 2019 TAMAR/CLAW/MAIN CLAW/CLAWTON BRIDGE/ 13272 2010, 2009, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012 2015, 2016 TAMAR/CLAW/MAIN CLAW/CLAW BRIDGE/ 13273 2010, 2009, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012 2019, 2015, 2013, 2016, 2014 2019 8961 8961 2013, 2014, 2012 8897 8897 2013, 2014