Skip to main content

Change your cookie settings

We cannot change your cookie settings at the moment because JavaScript is not running in your browser. To fix this, try:

  1. turning on JavaScript in your browser settings
  2. reloading this page
View cookies

Change your cookie settings

We cannot change your cookie settings at the moment because JavaScript is not running in your browser. To fix this, try:

  1. turning on JavaScript in your browser settings
  2. reloading this page
View cookies
  1. Home
  2. Search
  3. Trial of biodegradable mulch materials (Kent 2012)

Trial of biodegradable mulch materials (Kent 2012)

Summary

Mulches are materials applied to the soil surface to control the growth of competitive weeds. The durability, practicality, and weed control efficacy of a range of mulch materials was tested for three years on a fertile ex-arable site planted with ash trees (Fraxinus excelsior (L.)) in southern England. Herbicides controlled weed growth effectively and resulted in the largest height and diameter increments for the lowest material cost. Biodegradable starch membrane mats, compressed wood fibre boards and hemp fibre mats did not control weed growth and did not improve height or stem diameter increment compared to the control. Hardboard and rubber mats both controlled weed growth and also significantly increased height and stem diameter increment. However, hardboard was difficult to handle on-site and rubber mats increased mortality, probably by reducing soil moisture availability. Costs of these treatments were high, partly due to small scale, experimental manufacture. Coir fibre mats with photodegradable membrane backing were durable, highly effective and practical. This was the only commercially available fully degradable material tested that resulted in a good growth response, comparable to that of non-biodegradable black plastic mats, which are often used on sites where herbicide use is not appropriate. On similar ex-agricultural sites, where a non-chemical approach is desirable, 1.2 m x 1.2 m coir mats with a photodegradable membrane are a practical alternative resulting in cost-effective growth benefits, although herbicides remain a cheaper, more effective option. See also: Stokes, V. (2012) Some biodegradable mulch materials provide effective weed control during establishment of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) on farm woodland sites. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 106 (4): 257-268.

Categories

Use limitation statement

There are no public access constraints to this data. Use of this data is subject to the licence identified.

Licence

Contains Forestry Commission information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Attribution statement

If you use this data you must cite: Stokes, V. (2012) Some biodegradable mulch materials provide effective weed control during establishment of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) on farm woodland sites. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 106 (4): 257-268.

Use constraints

Forest Research must be acknowledged as the source of the data in any subsequent papers/products

Technical information

Update frequency

notPlanned

Lineage

Plot size 12 m x 12 m (0.014 ha), 16 trees per plot. All the trees were assessed in each plot. Trees at 2m x 2m spacing, with a 1m buffer zone on the border of each plot (i.e. 2m between each plot, and 6m between nearest trees in neighbouring plots in total). There were 4 replicates of each mulch treatment. The treatments are: 1. Isoplant wood fibre boards (1.2 x 1.2 m) 2. Hardboard/MDF wood fibre boards (1.0 x 1.0 m) 3. Resin-free Coir mat, plant fibre mat (1.0 x 1.0 m) 4. Resin-free Coir mat with photodegradable membrane (Greenfix, 1.2 x 1.2 m) 5. Biodegradable starch-based mat (Mater-Bi, 1.0 x 1.0 m) 6. Standard black plastic mulch mat (1.0 x 1.0 m) 7. Standard black plastic mulch mat (1.2 x 1.2 m) 8. Reusable rubber mat (1.0 x 1.0 m EPDM sheet) 9. Spot weed using herbicides (1.0 x 1.0m) 10. No weeding control Basal Treatments: Site was fenced against browsing mammals. Any established vegetation was killed with a pre plant spray of glyphosate in September, at least 7 days prior to cultivation. The site was sown with Lolium perenne (rye grass) after cultivation in September / October, to establish a grass sward across the experimental area. Planting stock was graded to be of a uniform size (no more than 50mm variation in height, 1mm variation in rcd). Plants were protected by vole guards. Mulches were fixed through grass sward, as per manufacturers recommendations. Assessments: Immediately after planting, and at the end of each year, survival, height and diameter at 5cm above ground level (marked with white paint at time of assessment) of all trees was assessed. To allow comparison between individual trees, assessment took place at the same start point in each plot, and each tree was measured in the same order in each plot for each assessment. A record of any damage caused to the trees by the mulch material was made. At 6 monthly intervals the effectiveness of the mulch material was assessed visually with an estimate of % weed cover penetration of each mulch mat over the plot as a whole. Soil moisture measurement throughout growing season used in situ theta probes buried beneath the mulches before installation.

Spatial information

Geographic extent

  • Latitude from: 51.394 to 51.402
  • Longitude from: 0.382 to 0.39
Metadata information

Language

English

Metadata identifier

c83b7388-c5bc-440a-a757-cb1b8be48192


Published by

Forestry Commission


Dataset reference dates

Creation date

01 November 2009

Revision date

06 May 2016

Publication date

N/A

Period

  • From: 13 March 2007
  • To: 03 November 2009

Search

Data and Supporting Information
Data services and download by area of interestLinkAction
Data downloadOpen link