Irthing DS Crammel Linn Waterfall Water Body Good ecological status
Get Irthing DS Crammel Linn Waterfall data Attributes Water Body ID GB102076073981 Water Body Type River Hydromorphological designation not designated artificial or heavily modified NGR NY6364567255 Catchment area 89.487 km2 Natural England Revised WB Protected Area targets http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5713963425726464 Surveillance Water Body No Length 59.291 km Catchment area 8948.7 ha Classifications Classification Item 2019 Ecological Good Biological quality elements Good Fish Good Invertebrates High Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good Macrophytes Sub Element Good Physico-chemical quality elements High Ammonia (Phys-Chem) High Dissolved oxygen High Phosphate High Temperature High pH High Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good Hydrological Regime Supports good Morphology Supports good Specific pollutants High Copper High Iron High Manganese High Chemical Fail Priority hazardous substances Fail Benzo(a)pyrene Good Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good Hexachlorobenzene Good Hexachlorobutadiene Good Mercury and Its Compounds Fail Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Fail Priority substances Good Cypermethrin (Priority) Good Fluoranthene Good Other Pollutants Does not require assessment
Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?
Investigations into classification status No data to show
Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD) All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in
this water body.
Reason Type SWMI Activity Category Classification Element More information RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Details RNAG measures delivered to address reason, awaiting recovery Not applicable No sector responsible Mercury and Its Compounds Details
Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors
identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are
individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a
confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest
classification is less than good status. There may be more than one
reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for
deterioration.
Significant water management issue Physical modifications Pollution from waste water Pollution from towns, cities and transport Changes to the natural flow and level of water Invasive non-native species Pollution from rural areas Pollution from abandoned mines Agriculture and rural land management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mining and quarrying 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Navigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban and transport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Industry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local & central government 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic general public 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waste treatment and disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No sector responsible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector under investigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Objectives Classification Item Status Year Reasons Ecological Good 2015 Biological quality elements Good 2015 Fish Good 2015 Invertebrates Good 2015 Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined Good 2015 Physico-chemical quality elements Good 2015 Ammonia (Phys-Chem) High 2015 Dissolved oxygen High 2015 Phosphate High 2015 Temperature Good 2015 pH Good 2015 Hydromorphological Supporting Elements Supports good 2015 Hydrological Regime Supports good 2015 Supporting elements (Surface Water) Not assessed 2015 Specific pollutants High 2015 Copper High 2015 Iron High 2015 Manganese High 2015 Chemical Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority hazardous substances Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Benzo(a)pyrene Good 2015 Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds Good 2015 Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxide Good 2015 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Good 2015 Hexachlorobenzene Good 2015 Hexachlorobutadiene Good 2015 Mercury and Its Compounds Good 2040 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) Good 2015 Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Good 2063 Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time Priority substances Good 2015 Cypermethrin (Priority) Good 2015 Fluoranthene Good 2015 Other Pollutants Does not require assessment 2015
Protected areas PA Name Id Directive More information Border Mires, Kielder-Butterburn UK0012923 Special Area of Conservation Natural England River Eden UK0012643 Special Area of Conservation Natural England Brampton Sand Sheet G52 Nitrates Directive
Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within
each cycle.
Monitoring Site Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 RIVER EDEN/RIVER IRTHING/CASTLE BECK/1275.30 US LANERCOST BRIDGE/ 17178 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012 2013, 2016, 2019, 2014, 2015 2019 RIVER IRTHING AT NEWBY EAST 88006332 2010, 2009, 2011, 2012 2016, 2015 BRAMPTON BECK D/S BRAMPTON AT NY52156135 88020082 2009 RIVER EDEN/RIVER IRTHING/CASTLE BECK/1275.20 DENTON FOOT/ 17091 2013, 2011 63386 63386 2014 2015, 2016, 2014 RIVER IRTHING @ RULEHOLME BRIDGE 88006321 2010, 2013, 2009, 2011, 2014, 2012 2016, 2015 RIVER IRTHING U/S B6318 88006331 2010, 2009, 2011, 2012 64479 64479 2009, 2014, 2011, 2010 2014, 2015, 2016 67939 67939 2009 RIVER EDEN/RIVER IRTHING/RED BECK/1273.00 RED BECK, NEAR GILSLAND/ 5171 2010, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2012 2013, 2016, 2019, 2014, 2015 2019 RIVER IRTHING AT LANERCOST 88006313 2010, 2013, 2009, 2011, 2014, 2012 2016, 2014, 2015, 2013