Upper Darent Water Body

Moderate ecological status

Attributes

  • Water Body IDGB106040024221
  • Water Body TypeRiver
  • Hydromorphological designationnot designated artificial or heavily modified
  • NGRTQ4808655420
  • Catchment area100.384 km2
  • Surveillance Water BodyNo
  • Length14.23 km
  • Catchment area10038.357 ha

Classifications

Classification Item2019
EcologicalModerate
Biological quality elementsModerate
FishModerate
InvertebratesHigh
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedModerate
Macrophytes Sub ElementModerate
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)High
Dissolved oxygenHigh
PhosphateGood
TemperatureHigh
pHHigh
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good
Hydrological RegimeDoes not support good
MorphologySupports good
Specific pollutantsHigh
CopperHigh
IronHigh
ManganeseHigh
ZincHigh
ChemicalFail
Priority hazardous substancesFail
AnthraceneGood
Benzo(a)pyreneGood
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good
HexachlorobenzeneGood
HexachlorobutadieneGood
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Fail
Priority substancesGood
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good
FluorantheneGood
Lead and Its CompoundsGood
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment

Why do all water bodies have a chemical status of fail?

Investigations into classification status

Classification ElementCycleYearStatusOutcome
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined32019Moderate
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined22019ModerateCertain there is not a problem

Reasons for not achieving good (RNAG) and reasons for deterioration (RFD)

All reasons (RFDs and RNAGs) attributed to the classification elements in this water body.

Reason TypeSWMIActivityCategoryClassification ElementMore information
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationImpoundment - u/s elevated water levelIndustryFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityIndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityWater IndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationImpoundment - u/s elevated water levelRecreationFishDetails
RNAGNaturalNatural conditions - otherNo sector responsibleMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGSuspect dataNot applicableNo sector responsibleMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor soil managementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGNaturalNatural conditions - otherNo sector responsibleMacrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourcePoor Livestock ManagementAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityWater IndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityRecreationFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationImpoundment - u/s elevated water levelIndustryFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityIndustryFishDetails
RNAGmeasures delivered to address reason, awaiting recoveryNot applicableNo sector responsiblePolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Details
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryHydrological RegimeDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityRecreationFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityUrban and transportFishDetails
RNAGDiffuse sourceRiparian/in-river activities (inc bankside erosion)Agriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGPhysical modificationBarriers - ecological discontinuityAgriculture and rural land managementFishDetails
RNAGFlowGroundwater abstractionWater IndustryFishDetails

Reasons for not achieving good status by business sector

The issues preventing waters reaching good status and the sectors identified as contributing to them. The numbers in the table are individual counts of the reasons for not achieving good status with a confidence status of 'confirmed' and 'probable', where the latest classification is less than good status. There may be more than one reason in a single water body. Note, table does not include reasons for deterioration.

Significant water management issuePhysical modificationsPollution from waste waterPollution from towns, cities and transportChanges to the natural flow and level of waterInvasive non-native speciesPollution from rural areasPollution from abandoned mines
Agriculture and rural land management1000060
Industry4000000
Mining and quarrying0000000
Navigation0000000
Urban and transport2000000
Water Industry2002000
Local & central government0000000
Domestic general public0000000
Recreation3000000
Waste treatment and disposal0000000
Other0000000
No sector responsible0000000
Sector under investigation0000000
Total12002060

Objectives

Classification ItemStatusYearReasons
EcologicalGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Biological quality elementsGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
FishGood2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
InvertebratesGood2015
Macrophytes and Phytobenthos CombinedGood2021Disproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Physico-chemical quality elementsGood2015
Ammonia (Phys-Chem)Good2015
Dissolved oxygenGood2015
PhosphateGood2015
TemperatureGood2015
pHGood2015
Hydromorphological Supporting ElementsSupports good2015
Hydrological RegimeSupports good2027 - Low confidenceDisproportionately expensive: Disproportionate burdens
Supporting elements (Surface Water)Not assessed2015
Specific pollutantsHigh2015
CopperHigh2015
IronHigh2015
ManganeseHigh2015
ZincHigh2015
ChemicalGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority hazardous substancesGood2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
AnthraceneGood2015
Benzo(a)pyreneGood2015
Cadmium and Its CompoundsGood2015
Dioxins and dioxin-like compoundsGood2015
Heptachlor and cis-Heptachlor epoxideGood2015
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)Good2015
HexachlorobenzeneGood2015
HexachlorobutadieneGood2015
Mercury and Its CompoundsGood2015
Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS)Good2015
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)Good2063Natural conditions: Chemical status recovery time
Priority substancesGood2015
Cypermethrin (Priority)Good2015
FluorantheneGood2015
Lead and Its CompoundsGood2015
Nickel and Its CompoundsGood2015
Other PollutantsDoes not require assessment2015

Protected areas

No data to show

Monitoring sites which have been used to classify this water body

Shows which sites were used for classification for which years within each cycle.

Monitoring SiteCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
DARENT/DARENT - MAIN RIVER/SUNDRIDGE/ 105852012, 2010, 2013, 2009, 2011, 20142015, 2013, 2016, 2019, 20142019
DARENT/DARENT - MAIN RIVER/QUEBEC HOUSE CAR PARK WESTERHAM/ 381272012, 2013
DARENT/DARENT - MAIN RIVER/PARK FARM/ 394872012, 2013, 20142015, 2013, 2016, 2019, 20142019
44336 4433620192019
159482 15948220142014, 2016, 2015, 20192019
OTFORD GAUGING STATION E00001352010, 2009, 2011, 20122016, 2019, 20152019
DARENT/DARENT - MAIN RIVER/SEVENOAKS WILDFOWL RESERVE/ 342682012, 2010, 2013, 20112015, 2013, 2016, 20192019
44215 4421520142019, 2015, 2016, 20142019
44340 4434020192019
DARENT/DARENT - MAIN RIVER/WESTERHAM/ 106882012, 2010, 2009, 2011

Upstream water bodies

    Downstream water bodies